Critical review of methodological tools and trends for assessing the performance of inclusive circular cities

The comprehensive sustainability assessment of urban waste management systems (UWMSs) is crucial for understanding the impact of current and future city strategies aimed at improving circularity and inclusion in cities. In this study we propose a framework for conceptualizing the inclusive circular city (ICC), and we review specifically scientific literature on methodological tools and trends in integrated sustainability assessments (ISAs) of UWMSs. Of the 145 publications reviewed, only 10 % concurrently evaluated social, environmental, and economic aspects, and just 2 % incorporated circularity and inclusion metrics. Publications focusing simultaneously either on social and environmental dimensions or economic and environmental dimensions accounted for 3 % and 17 % of studies, respectively, while 70 % adopted a single-dimensional approach. A notable proportion of studies focused exclusively on environmental impact assessment, predominantly employing life cycle assessment or indicators such as carbon footprint. Social assessments were notably less prevalent, comprising only 20 % of studies. Stakeholder engagement and inclusion metrics were considered in 20 % and 5 % of the publications, respectively. In terms of R strategies, 65 % of the studies concentrated on recycling and recovery, targeting mainly municipal solid waste. To advance our knowledge on ISAs of UWMSs and improve our understanding of their embeddedness in ICCs, future research should: (a) focus on multidimensional, transdisciplinary assessments with an emphasis on strong sustainability-oriented methodologies by including circularity and inclusion metrics; (b) prioritize inclusion and active stakeholder participation in collaborative knowledge creation; and (c) shift the focus from conventional waste recycling and recovery to ambitious circular strategies that retain resources in closed-loop systems. • Integrated Sustainability Assessments (ISAs) of UWMSs are still limited. • Social aspects were underrepresented in ISAs. • Very few ISA studies considered inclusion and circularity metrics simultaneously. • Circular economy strategies predominantly focus on recycling and resource recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100275
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical review of methodological tools and trends for assessing the performance of inclusive circular cities

Martin de Jong, Filippos K. Zisopoulos, Daan F. J. Schraven, Susana Toboso‐Chavero
4 citations
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
4.03
article

Critical review of methodological tools and trends for assessing the performance of inclusive circular cities

Martin de Jong, Filippos K. Zisopoulos, Daan F. J. Schraven, Susana Toboso‐Chavero
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The comprehensive sustainability assessment of urban waste management systems (UWMSs) is crucial for understanding the impact of current and future city strategies aimed at improving circularity and inclusion in cities. In this study we propose a framework for conceptualizing the inclusive circular city (ICC), and we review specifically scientific literature on methodological tools and trends in integrated sustainability assessments (ISAs) of UWMSs. Of the 145 publications reviewed, only 10 % concurrently evaluated social, environmental, and economic aspects, and just 2 % incorporated circularity and inclusion metrics. Publications focusing simultaneously either on social and environmental dimensions or economic and environmental dimensions accounted for 3 % and 17 % of studies, respectively, while 70 % adopted a single-dimensional approach. A notable proportion of studies focused exclusively on environmental impact assessment, predominantly employing life cycle assessment or indicators such as carbon footprint. Social assessments were notably less prevalent, comprising only 20 % of studies. Stakeholder engagement and inclusion metrics were considered in 20 % and 5 % of the publications, respectively. In terms of R strategies, 65 % of the studies concentrated on recycling and recovery, targeting mainly municipal solid waste. To advance our knowledge on ISAs of UWMSs and improve our understanding of their embeddedness in ICCs, future research should: (a) focus on multidimensional, transdisciplinary assessments with an emphasis on strong sustainability-oriented methodologies by including circularity and inclusion metrics; (b) prioritize inclusion and active stakeholder participation in collaborative knowledge creation; and (c) shift the focus from conventional waste recycling and recovery to ambitious circular strategies that retain resources in closed-loop systems. • Integrated Sustainability Assessments (ISAs) of UWMSs are still limited. • Social aspects were underrepresented in ISAs. • Very few ISA studies considered inclusion and circularity metrics simultaneously. • Circular economy strategies predominantly focus on recycling and resource recovery.

Cleaner Environmental SystemsVol. 17
Fudan University (CN), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.