Charting the Technology Cold War: the balance of loss, U.S. containment strategies and China’s countermeasures

Abstract The Technology Cold War primarily characterized by America’s intensifying technological containment against China and China’s countermeasures has been ongoing since the first Trump administration. It is essentially a negative-sum game operating on the logic of balance of loss, where the containing party attempts to inflict massive loss on the contained party while limiting loss to itself. The U.S. technological containment aims to hinder China’s further technological development by restricting technology, market, and capital access. Breaking this containment requires changing the calculation of the balance of loss. China’s response can be summarized as rule-centric, technology-centric, and statecraft-centric approaches. During Trump’s second term and beyond, the Technology Cold War will likely persist, and insights for resolving the current technological rivalry can be derived from the conclusion of arms race. Establishing mutual boundaries once both sides acknowledge the necessity of coexistence would be the most likely outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China International Strategy Review
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-025-00180-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Charting the Technology Cold War: the balance of loss, U.S. containment strategies and China’s countermeasures

Zhipei Chi
2 citations
China International Strategy Review
International Relations and Foreign Policy
17.04
article

Charting the Technology Cold War: the balance of loss, U.S. containment strategies and China’s countermeasures

Zhipei Chi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Technology Cold War primarily characterized by America’s intensifying technological containment against China and China’s countermeasures has been ongoing since the first Trump administration. It is essentially a negative-sum game operating on the logic of balance of loss, where the containing party attempts to inflict massive loss on the contained party while limiting loss to itself. The U.S. technological containment aims to hinder China’s further technological development by restricting technology, market, and capital access. Breaking this containment requires changing the calculation of the balance of loss. China’s response can be summarized as rule-centric, technology-centric, and statecraft-centric approaches. During Trump’s second term and beyond, the Technology Cold War will likely persist, and insights for resolving the current technological rivalry can be derived from the conclusion of arms race. Establishing mutual boundaries once both sides acknowledge the necessity of coexistence would be the most likely outcome.

China International Strategy ReviewVol. 7(1)
Central University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.