Impact of Input and Output Devices on a Virtual Ultrasound Training
Performing ultrasound requires mental skills that have to be trained hands on. Virtual simulations can be employed to provide novice surgeons with a safe training environment prior to performing ultrasound on the patient. For both input and output there is a wide range of devices that are used in existing ultrasound simulations. Because the devices have their limitations and benefits regarding realism, costs, and access, we compared three technical setups: desktop with mouse interaction, desktop with a haptic device, and virtual reality with a haptic device. In a user study with 19 participants we investigated the usability and assessed qualitative user feedback in a semi-structured interview. Significant differences regarding usability and training time were found between both versions with the haptic device and the desktop with mouse version. Based on the feedback, using a haptic device seems to be more relevant than the two output devices in this training case.
Authors
- Mareen Allgaier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7099-4819)
- Florentine Huettl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3281-8566)
- Christian Hansen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5734-7529)
- Bernhard Preim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-9478)
- Laura Isabel Hanke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8483-1984)
- Tobias Huber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3219-501X)
- Eric-Morten Dangszat
Institutions
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-03-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/vrw66409.2025.00191
- Primary Topic
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00