Impact of Input and Output Devices on a Virtual Ultrasound Training

Performing ultrasound requires mental skills that have to be trained hands on. Virtual simulations can be employed to provide novice surgeons with a safe training environment prior to performing ultrasound on the patient. For both input and output there is a wide range of devices that are used in existing ultrasound simulations. Because the devices have their limitations and benefits regarding realism, costs, and access, we compared three technical setups: desktop with mouse interaction, desktop with a haptic device, and virtual reality with a haptic device. In a user study with 19 participants we investigated the usability and assessed qualitative user feedback in a semi-structured interview. Significant differences regarding usability and training time were found between both versions with the haptic device and the desktop with mouse version. Based on the feedback, using a haptic device seems to be more relevant than the two output devices in this training case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/vrw66409.2025.00191
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Input and Output Devices on a Virtual Ultrasound Training

Mareen Allgaier, Florentine Huettl, Christian Hansen, Bernhard Preim et al.
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Impact of Input and Output Devices on a Virtual Ultrasound Training

Mareen Allgaier, Florentine Huettl, Christian Hansen, Bernhard Preim, Laura Isabel Hanke, Tobias Huber, Eric-Morten Dangszat
article en

Abstract

Performing ultrasound requires mental skills that have to be trained hands on. Virtual simulations can be employed to provide novice surgeons with a safe training environment prior to performing ultrasound on the patient. For both input and output there is a wide range of devices that are used in existing ultrasound simulations. Because the devices have their limitations and benefits regarding realism, costs, and access, we compared three technical setups: desktop with mouse interaction, desktop with a haptic device, and virtual reality with a haptic device. In a user study with 19 participants we investigated the usability and assessed qualitative user feedback in a semi-structured interview. Significant differences regarding usability and training time were found between both versions with the haptic device and the desktop with mouse version. Based on the feedback, using a haptic device seems to be more relevant than the two output devices in this training case.

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of Input and Output Devices on a Virtual Ultrasound Training — Mareen Allgaier, Florentine Huettl, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS