Inaccurate Empathy is Worse than Minimal Empathy in Affective Human-Robot Interaction

Simulated empathy is valuable for conversational agents and robots in emotionally sensitive domains such as counseling, healthcare, and customer service. However, the appropriateness of different types of empathy for different task domains is under-explored. We describe the results from a study comparing three approaches to the automatic generation of empathic responses for a conversational robot that conducts a depression screening conversation with a user. The computational models of empathy incorporate both rule-driven, theory-based responses with data-driven responses from a transformer model. Our primary finding i s t hat a sour empathic response models increase in sophistication their empathic accuracy decreases, resulting in more erroneous responses. Empathic inaccuracy, in turn, led to significantly lower ratings o f working a lliance, a measure of user trust in and liking of the robot.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aciiw63320.2024.00059
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inaccurate Empathy is Worse than Minimal Empathy in Affective Human-Robot Interaction

Keith Rebello, Timothy Bickmore, Stacy Marsella
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Inaccurate Empathy is Worse than Minimal Empathy in Affective Human-Robot Interaction

Keith Rebello, Timothy Bickmore, Stacy Marsella
article en

Abstract

Simulated empathy is valuable for conversational agents and robots in emotionally sensitive domains such as counseling, healthcare, and customer service. However, the appropriateness of different types of empathy for different task domains is under-explored. We describe the results from a study comparing three approaches to the automatic generation of empathic responses for a conversational robot that conducts a depression screening conversation with a user. The computational models of empathy incorporate both rule-driven, theory-based responses with data-driven responses from a transformer model. Our primary finding i s t hat a sour empathic response models increase in sophistication their empathic accuracy decreases, resulting in more erroneous responses. Empathic inaccuracy, in turn, led to significantly lower ratings o f working a lliance, a measure of user trust in and liking of the robot.

Northeastern University (US), University of Waterloo (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inaccurate Empathy is Worse than Minimal Empathy in Affective Human-Robot Interaction — Keith Rebello, Timothy Bickmore, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS