Comparison of Spinal Cord Regeneration Capacity in Zebrafish and Medaka

In mammals, spinal cord injury often results in permanent impairment of motor function owing to ineffective tissue regeneration. Unlike mammals, zebrafish have the remarkable ability to regenerate many tissues, including the spinal cord. Cross-species comparison is an attractive approach for revealing regeneration-specific mechanisms, but the large evolutionary distance between species sometimes hinders direct comparison. Recent studies have revealed that another model fish species, medaka, has a low regenerative ability in some tissues, making comparisons with them advantageous to revealing regeneration-specific mechanisms. However, their spinal cord regenerative ability has not been compared to other models. In this study, we functionally and histologically compared the spinal cord regeneration abilities of zebrafish and medaka. Swimming speed recovery was significantly lower in medaka than in zebrafish. Bridging of glia and neural tissue were thinner in medaka than in zebrafish. Axonal extension across the injured site was observed in zebrafish but not in medaka. Comparison of their gene expression profiles revealed genes involved in "Regeneration" were upregulated in zebrafish, whereas genes related to "Synaptic signaling" were downregulated in medaka. These results suggest that the ability to regenerate the spinal cord is lower in medaka than in zebrafish, making medaka an attractive model for revealing the mechanisms of spinal cord regeneration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurochemical Research
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-025-04389-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Spinal Cord Regeneration Capacity in Zebrafish and Medaka

Masato Hori, Hiroshi Tsujioka, H Zhang, Toshihide Yamashita et al.
2 citations
Neurochemical Research
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
2.30
article

Comparison of Spinal Cord Regeneration Capacity in Zebrafish and Medaka

Masato Hori, Hiroshi Tsujioka, H Zhang, Toshihide Yamashita, Shun Aoki
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In mammals, spinal cord injury often results in permanent impairment of motor function owing to ineffective tissue regeneration. Unlike mammals, zebrafish have the remarkable ability to regenerate many tissues, including the spinal cord. Cross-species comparison is an attractive approach for revealing regeneration-specific mechanisms, but the large evolutionary distance between species sometimes hinders direct comparison. Recent studies have revealed that another model fish species, medaka, has a low regenerative ability in some tissues, making comparisons with them advantageous to revealing regeneration-specific mechanisms. However, their spinal cord regenerative ability has not been compared to other models. In this study, we functionally and histologically compared the spinal cord regeneration abilities of zebrafish and medaka. Swimming speed recovery was significantly lower in medaka than in zebrafish. Bridging of glia and neural tissue were thinner in medaka than in zebrafish. Axonal extension across the injured site was observed in zebrafish but not in medaka. Comparison of their gene expression profiles revealed genes involved in "Regeneration" were upregulated in zebrafish, whereas genes related to "Synaptic signaling" were downregulated in medaka. These results suggest that the ability to regenerate the spinal cord is lower in medaka than in zebrafish, making medaka an attractive model for revealing the mechanisms of spinal cord regeneration.

Neurochemical ResearchVol. 50(3)
The University of Osaka (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
2.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.