Analysis of In-Situ Dynamic Ground Support Test Results with Insights Revealed by Time-Dependent Terms of Power and Strain Rate

Abstract The capacity of ground support subjected to dynamic loading is commonly expressed in terms of load, displacement, and energy absorption. Most current laboratory and in-situ dynamic tests of ground reinforcement elements utilize mass drop under gravity from a certain height to generate energy and displacement in the test specimen, but neglect to consider the power and strain rate (time factor terms) in the analysis of test results. Energy and power are very closely related parameters, where power describes how fast energy leaves or comes into a system. Power is an important parameter for describing the impact supplied to a reinforcement element and the resulting reaction. The maximum power a reinforcement element can survive found to be an effective means of making comparisons between reinforcement elements. In this research three case analyses were carried out. These were previous laboratory dynamic tests conducted at the WASM testing facility, the in-situ prototype dynamic testing experiment conducted at the Mt Charlotte Mine, and in-situ dynamic testing carried out using an advanced in-situ dynamic testing rig in nine mines across Australia and Canada. The calculated energy and other parameters from in-situ dynamic tests allowed the formulation of the input power component and strain rate. Relationships were apparent between input energy, average input power, displacement, mechanism of yielding of dynamic reinforcement elements and average strain rate for the tests. The outcomes of the time factor analysis from the three cases were compared to reveal additional information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-04578-6
Primary Topic
Geophysical Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of In-Situ Dynamic Ground Support Test Results with Insights Revealed by Time-Dependent Terms of Power and Strain Rate

Belay Gebremedhin, Bradley Darlington, Mohammad Sarmadivaleh, Peter Mikula
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Geophysical Methods and Applications
article

Analysis of In-Situ Dynamic Ground Support Test Results with Insights Revealed by Time-Dependent Terms of Power and Strain Rate

Belay Gebremedhin, Bradley Darlington, Mohammad Sarmadivaleh, Peter Mikula
article en

Abstract

Abstract The capacity of ground support subjected to dynamic loading is commonly expressed in terms of load, displacement, and energy absorption. Most current laboratory and in-situ dynamic tests of ground reinforcement elements utilize mass drop under gravity from a certain height to generate energy and displacement in the test specimen, but neglect to consider the power and strain rate (time factor terms) in the analysis of test results. Energy and power are very closely related parameters, where power describes how fast energy leaves or comes into a system. Power is an important parameter for describing the impact supplied to a reinforcement element and the resulting reaction. The maximum power a reinforcement element can survive found to be an effective means of making comparisons between reinforcement elements. In this research three case analyses were carried out. These were previous laboratory dynamic tests conducted at the WASM testing facility, the in-situ prototype dynamic testing experiment conducted at the Mt Charlotte Mine, and in-situ dynamic testing carried out using an advanced in-situ dynamic testing rig in nine mines across Australia and Canada. The calculated energy and other parameters from in-situ dynamic tests allowed the formulation of the input power component and strain rate. Relationships were apparent between input energy, average input power, displacement, mechanism of yielding of dynamic reinforcement elements and average strain rate for the tests. The outcomes of the time factor analysis from the three cases were compared to reveal additional information.

Rock Mechanics and Rock EngineeringVol. 58(8)
Curtin University (AU), Department of Mines and Petroleum (AU), Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines (Australia) (AU), Australian Resources Research Centre (AU), Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Geophysical Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.