Power Relations in the Preparation of the Nondiscrimination Act: The Controversial Issue of Supervising Discrimination in Working Life

ABSTRACT In the context of Europeanisation and neo‐corporatism, we examine the lengthy process of revising the Nondiscrimination Act in Finland, spanning from 2007 to 2023. The focus is on the mandate of the Nondiscrimination Ombudsman in the workplace and on explaining the sudden policy change of strengthening it after a prolonged standstill. The study employs the Advocacy Coalition Framework, especially the approach of Coalition Opportunity Structures, combined with path dependency in relation to legal frames, in examining the struggle between the labour policy coalition and the coalition of human rights advocates. The case exemplifies the intertwining of legal, institutional, and political structures as strategic means and necessary precursors to policy change, which was a breakthrough for the human rights advocates. Yet the ultimate decisive factor was the political landscape, which reminds us of the inherently political nature of national‐level lawmaking, further supported by the erosion of tripartite lawmaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Policy Analysis
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70007
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power Relations in the Preparation of the Nondiscrimination Act: The Controversial Issue of Supervising Discrimination in Working Life

Kati Rantala, Laura Jauhola
European Policy Analysis
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Power Relations in the Preparation of the Nondiscrimination Act: The Controversial Issue of Supervising Discrimination in Working Life

Kati Rantala, Laura Jauhola
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the context of Europeanisation and neo‐corporatism, we examine the lengthy process of revising the Nondiscrimination Act in Finland, spanning from 2007 to 2023. The focus is on the mandate of the Nondiscrimination Ombudsman in the workplace and on explaining the sudden policy change of strengthening it after a prolonged standstill. The study employs the Advocacy Coalition Framework, especially the approach of Coalition Opportunity Structures, combined with path dependency in relation to legal frames, in examining the struggle between the labour policy coalition and the coalition of human rights advocates. The case exemplifies the intertwining of legal, institutional, and political structures as strategic means and necessary precursors to policy change, which was a breakthrough for the human rights advocates. Yet the ultimate decisive factor was the political landscape, which reminds us of the inherently political nature of national‐level lawmaking, further supported by the erosion of tripartite lawmaking.

European Policy AnalysisVol. 12(1)
University of Helsinki (FI)
Strategic Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Power Relations in the Preparation of the Nondiscrimination Act: The Controversial Issue of Supervising Discrimination in Working Life — Kati Rantala, Laura Jauhola · European Policy Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS