Writing in community: Relationship building and accountability in knowledge production

Abstract As anthropology reckons with its past, present, and future, anthropologists increasingly seek to challenge inequities within the discipline and academia more broadly. Anthropology, regardless of subdiscipline, is a social endeavor. Yet research often remains an isolating (though not necessarily solitary) process, even within research teams and in coauthorship contexts. Here, we focus on peer‐reviewed publication as the principal manifestation of knowledge production and propose a method for challenging division, hierarchy, power differentials, and adherence to tradition: writing in community . Writing in community is a collaborative form of writing that centers care, abundance, joy, and personal satisfaction over the individuality currently rewarded by the academy. This process engenders consensus, circumvents normative hierarchical research and writing, and promotes relationship building. Here, we experiment by inviting reviewers and editors into our community to collectively contribute to the writing process and reflect on that experience together. Ultimately, we challenge norms for scholarship, (co)authorship, and ways of knowing to offer a more equitable praxis of knowledge production. We propose that writing in community can help anthropologists enact values of multivocality and research transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Anthropologist
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.28070
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Writing in community: Relationship building and accountability in knowledge production

Lisa Hodgetts, María José Figuerero Torres, Sarah Herr, Mónica Barnes et al.
2 citations
American Anthropologist
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
30.35
article

Writing in community: Relationship building and accountability in knowledge production

Lisa Hodgetts, María José Figuerero Torres, Sarah Herr, Mónica Barnes, Elizabeth Chin, Kirk A. Maasch, Christa Craven, Daniel H. Sandweiss, Kristina Douglass, Jordi A. Rivera Prince, Emily M. Blackwood, Kylie Quave, Emily B. P. Milton, Danilyn Rutherford, María A. Gutiérrez, Madeleine Landrum, Elizabeth L. Rodgers
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract As anthropology reckons with its past, present, and future, anthropologists increasingly seek to challenge inequities within the discipline and academia more broadly. Anthropology, regardless of subdiscipline, is a social endeavor. Yet research often remains an isolating (though not necessarily solitary) process, even within research teams and in coauthorship contexts. Here, we focus on peer‐reviewed publication as the principal manifestation of knowledge production and propose a method for challenging division, hierarchy, power differentials, and adherence to tradition: writing in community . Writing in community is a collaborative form of writing that centers care, abundance, joy, and personal satisfaction over the individuality currently rewarded by the academy. This process engenders consensus, circumvents normative hierarchical research and writing, and promotes relationship building. Here, we experiment by inviting reviewers and editors into our community to collectively contribute to the writing process and reflect on that experience together. Ultimately, we challenge norms for scholarship, (co)authorship, and ways of knowing to offer a more equitable praxis of knowledge production. We propose that writing in community can help anthropologists enact values of multivocality and research transparency.

American AnthropologistVol. 127(2)
College of Wooster (US), Western University (CA), American Museum of Natural History (US), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), George Washington University (US), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Brown University (US), Archaeology Southwest (US), Wenner-Gren Foundation (US), Columbia University (US), University of Maine (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
30.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.