Comparative Evaluation of Craniofacial Morphology between Monozygotic and Dizygotic Individuals and Zygosity determination by Microsatellites -A Dermatoglyphic Study

Introduction: The interplay between genetic and environmental factors in craniofacial growth and development has long been a subject of research. This study aims to evaluate craniofacial morphology differences between monozygotic and dizygotic twins and determine zygosity using microsatellites and dermatoglyphics. Materials and Methodology: A total of 33 pairs of twins (aged 16–26 years) from Chennai were analyzed. Zygosity determination was performed using microsatellites as DNA markers and fingerprint dermatoglyphic patterns. Craniofacial morphology was assessed through cephalometric analysis. Statistical evaluation was conducted using Pearson's correlation and independent t-tests. Results: Monozygotic twins exhibited a significantly higher genetic influence on vertical craniofacial parameters compared to dizygotic twins. Dermatoglyphic analysis showed that total numerical fingerprint values were more reliable in determining zygosity than ridge counts. Microsatellite markers provided a 98% accuracy rate in zygosity determination. Conclusion: This study confirms that genetic factors strongly influence craniofacial morphology, particularly vertical dimensions. Microsatellite DNA markers are a highly reliable method for zygosity determination, while dermatoglyphic patterns offer supplementary insights. The findings have important implications for Orthodontic treatment planning by identifying heritable skeletal characteristics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.3170
Primary Topic
Dermatoglyphics and Human Traits
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Craniofacial Morphology between Monozygotic and Dizygotic Individuals and Zygosity determination by Microsatellites -A Dermatoglyphic Study

Pavithra Bai M, Swati Ramesh Patil, Suchareeta Panda, Pratap Varma KVV et al.
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Dermatoglyphics and Human Traits
article

Comparative Evaluation of Craniofacial Morphology between Monozygotic and Dizygotic Individuals and Zygosity determination by Microsatellites -A Dermatoglyphic Study

Pavithra Bai M, Swati Ramesh Patil, Suchareeta Panda, Pratap Varma KVV, Goutham.N Goutham.N, Naveen Kumar C
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The interplay between genetic and environmental factors in craniofacial growth and development has long been a subject of research. This study aims to evaluate craniofacial morphology differences between monozygotic and dizygotic twins and determine zygosity using microsatellites and dermatoglyphics. Materials and Methodology: A total of 33 pairs of twins (aged 16–26 years) from Chennai were analyzed. Zygosity determination was performed using microsatellites as DNA markers and fingerprint dermatoglyphic patterns. Craniofacial morphology was assessed through cephalometric analysis. Statistical evaluation was conducted using Pearson's correlation and independent t-tests. Results: Monozygotic twins exhibited a significantly higher genetic influence on vertical craniofacial parameters compared to dizygotic twins. Dermatoglyphic analysis showed that total numerical fingerprint values were more reliable in determining zygosity than ridge counts. Microsatellite markers provided a 98% accuracy rate in zygosity determination. Conclusion: This study confirms that genetic factors strongly influence craniofacial morphology, particularly vertical dimensions. Microsatellite DNA markers are a highly reliable method for zygosity determination, while dermatoglyphic patterns offer supplementary insights. The findings have important implications for Orthodontic treatment planning by identifying heritable skeletal characteristics.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(12S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Dermatoglyphics and Human Traits
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.