Mean temperature–velocity relation and a new temperature wall model for compressible laminar and turbulent flows

The well-known quadratic temperature–velocity (TV) relation is significant for physical understanding and modelling of compressible wall-bounded turbulence. Meanwhile, there is an increasing interest in employing the TV relation for laminar modelling. In this work, we revisit the TV relation for both laminar and turbulent flows, aiming to explain the success of the TV relation where it works, improve its accuracy where it deviates and relax its limitation as a wall model for accurate temperature prediction. We show that the general recovery factor defined by Zhang et al. ( J. Fluid. Mech. , vol. 739, 2014, pp. 392–440) is not a wall-normal constant in most laminar and turbulent cases. The effective Prandtl number $Pr_e$ is more critical in determining the shape of temperature profiles. The quadratic TV relation systematically deviates for laminar boundary layers irrespective of Mach number and wall boundary conditions. We find a universal distribution of $Pr_e$ , based on which the TV relation can be notably improved, especially for cold-wall cases. For turbulent flows, the TV relation as the wall model can effectively improve the near-wall temperature prediction for cold-wall boundary layer cases, but it involves boundary-layer-edge quantities used in the Reynolds analogy scaling, which hinders the application of the wall model in complex flows. We propose a transformation-based temperature wall model by solving inversely the newly developed temperature transformation of Cheng and Fu ( Phy. Rev. Fluids , vol. 9, 2024, no. 054610). The dependence on edge quantities is thus removed in the new model and the high accuracy in turbulent temperature prediction is maintained for boundary layer flows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2025.312
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mean temperature–velocity relation and a new temperature wall model for compressible laminar and turbulent flows

Jianping Gan, Lin Fu, Xianliang Chen
12 citations
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
16.02
article

Mean temperature–velocity relation and a new temperature wall model for compressible laminar and turbulent flows

Jianping Gan, Lin Fu, Xianliang Chen
article en
12 citations

Abstract

The well-known quadratic temperature–velocity (TV) relation is significant for physical understanding and modelling of compressible wall-bounded turbulence. Meanwhile, there is an increasing interest in employing the TV relation for laminar modelling. In this work, we revisit the TV relation for both laminar and turbulent flows, aiming to explain the success of the TV relation where it works, improve its accuracy where it deviates and relax its limitation as a wall model for accurate temperature prediction. We show that the general recovery factor defined by Zhang et al. ( J. Fluid. Mech. , vol. 739, 2014, pp. 392–440) is not a wall-normal constant in most laminar and turbulent cases. The effective Prandtl number $Pr_e$ is more critical in determining the shape of temperature profiles. The quadratic TV relation systematically deviates for laminar boundary layers irrespective of Mach number and wall boundary conditions. We find a universal distribution of $Pr_e$ , based on which the TV relation can be notably improved, especially for cold-wall cases. For turbulent flows, the TV relation as the wall model can effectively improve the near-wall temperature prediction for cold-wall boundary layer cases, but it involves boundary-layer-edge quantities used in the Reynolds analogy scaling, which hinders the application of the wall model in complex flows. We propose a transformation-based temperature wall model by solving inversely the newly developed temperature transformation of Cheng and Fu ( Phy. Rev. Fluids , vol. 9, 2024, no. 054610). The dependence on edge quantities is thus removed in the new model and the high accuracy in turbulent temperature prediction is maintained for boundary layer flows.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1009
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
16.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.