A cross-linguistic analysis of mental health discourse in European parliamentary debates: a corpus-based study using ParlaMint

Purpose This study aims to examine how mental health is represented in European parliamentary discourse by analyzing patterns, frequencies and variations in mental health terminology across multiple European parliaments, providing insights into political attention to mental health issues over time and across different contexts. Design/methodology/approach The research uses corpus linguistics methods to analyze mental health references in parliamentary debates from 24 European languages using the ParlaMint corpus (1996–2024). A glossary of mental health terminology derived from Bupa (2025) was used to identify relevant terms across languages. The analysis examines variations by country, time period or gender while acknowledging methodological limitations in corpora regarding demographic representation for political parties, for example. Findings Results reveal significant geographic variations, with Northern and Western European parliaments showing higher frequencies of mental health references. A clear upward trajectory in mental health discourse was observed over time, with substantial increases between 2014 and 2015 and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021), when references peaked. Female parliamentarians appear to place relatively greater emphasis on mental health issues compared to their overall representation. Originality/value This study provides an interesting and updated large-scale, cross-national analysis of parliamentary discourse on mental health using comparable parliamentary corpora across multiple languages. It contributes methodologically through the creation of an open-access derived corpus specifically focused on mental health discourse in European parliaments. The findings offer novel insights into how mental health is conceptualized and prioritized in different political contexts with implications for mental health advocacy and policy development across Europe. A multilingual mental health discourse in the Parliaments corpus has been created.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mental Health and Social Inclusion
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-03-2025-0086
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-linguistic analysis of mental health discourse in European parliamentary debates: a corpus-based study using ParlaMint

Antoni Brosa Rodríguez
Mental Health and Social Inclusion
Mental Health via Writing
article

A cross-linguistic analysis of mental health discourse in European parliamentary debates: a corpus-based study using ParlaMint

Antoni Brosa Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how mental health is represented in European parliamentary discourse by analyzing patterns, frequencies and variations in mental health terminology across multiple European parliaments, providing insights into political attention to mental health issues over time and across different contexts. Design/methodology/approach The research uses corpus linguistics methods to analyze mental health references in parliamentary debates from 24 European languages using the ParlaMint corpus (1996–2024). A glossary of mental health terminology derived from Bupa (2025) was used to identify relevant terms across languages. The analysis examines variations by country, time period or gender while acknowledging methodological limitations in corpora regarding demographic representation for political parties, for example. Findings Results reveal significant geographic variations, with Northern and Western European parliaments showing higher frequencies of mental health references. A clear upward trajectory in mental health discourse was observed over time, with substantial increases between 2014 and 2015 and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021), when references peaked. Female parliamentarians appear to place relatively greater emphasis on mental health issues compared to their overall representation. Originality/value This study provides an interesting and updated large-scale, cross-national analysis of parliamentary discourse on mental health using comparable parliamentary corpora across multiple languages. It contributes methodologically through the creation of an open-access derived corpus specifically focused on mental health discourse in European parliaments. The findings offer novel insights into how mental health is conceptualized and prioritized in different political contexts with implications for mental health advocacy and policy development across Europe. A multilingual mental health discourse in the Parliaments corpus has been created.

Mental Health and Social InclusionVol. 30(1)
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.