Multitemporal river flow discharge prediction: A new framework for integrated environmental management and flood control

Riverine flow estimation is critical for effective water resource management and mitigation planning. Traditional machine learning and deep learning models offer various advantages, but their effectiveness in multitemporal river flow discharge estimation has yet to be fully explored. This study introduces an advanced universal group method of data handling (AUGMDH) model to predict river flow discharge across various temporal scales. The accuracy of the proposed model is compared with that of convolutional neural network (CNN) models in terms of estimating daily, mean monthly, and maximum monthly flow discharge. The AUGMDH model consistently outperforms the CNN models across all major performance metrics, such as the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), RMSE-observed standard deviation ratio (RSR), and percent bias (PBIAS), achieving an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.972 and an NSE of 0.972 for the daily flow, an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.810 and an NSE of 0.810 for the mean monthly flow, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.819 and an NSE of 0.818 for the maximum monthly flow. Additionally, compared to the CNN approach, the AUGMDH model yields lower AIC values across all the cases (AIC: 37,744 for daily, 2144 for mean monthly, and 2543 for maximum monthly), indicating a better balance between simplicity and accuracy. In terms of uncertainty analysis, the AUGMDH model exhibits lower uncertainty values (i.e., 2.77 for daily flow, 2.31 for mean monthly flow, and 2.46 for maximum monthly flow estimates) than the CNN models do (i.e., 2.78 for daily flow, 2.48 mean monthly flow, and 2.66 for maximum monthly flow estimates). The findings indicate that the AUGMDH model provides a more robust and reliable solution for riverine flood estimation, outperforming the CNN models across all major performance metrics, including accuracy, reliability, and computational efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125372
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multitemporal river flow discharge prediction: A new framework for integrated environmental management and flood control

Silvio José Gumière, Isa Ebtehaj, Hossein Bonakdari, Afshin Amiri et al.
3 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.45
article

Multitemporal river flow discharge prediction: A new framework for integrated environmental management and flood control

Silvio José Gumière, Isa Ebtehaj, Hossein Bonakdari, Afshin Amiri, Victor Joubier
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Riverine flow estimation is critical for effective water resource management and mitigation planning. Traditional machine learning and deep learning models offer various advantages, but their effectiveness in multitemporal river flow discharge estimation has yet to be fully explored. This study introduces an advanced universal group method of data handling (AUGMDH) model to predict river flow discharge across various temporal scales. The accuracy of the proposed model is compared with that of convolutional neural network (CNN) models in terms of estimating daily, mean monthly, and maximum monthly flow discharge. The AUGMDH model consistently outperforms the CNN models across all major performance metrics, such as the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), RMSE-observed standard deviation ratio (RSR), and percent bias (PBIAS), achieving an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.972 and an NSE of 0.972 for the daily flow, an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.810 and an NSE of 0.810 for the mean monthly flow, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.819 and an NSE of 0.818 for the maximum monthly flow. Additionally, compared to the CNN approach, the AUGMDH model yields lower AIC values across all the cases (AIC: 37,744 for daily, 2144 for mean monthly, and 2543 for maximum monthly), indicating a better balance between simplicity and accuracy. In terms of uncertainty analysis, the AUGMDH model exhibits lower uncertainty values (i.e., 2.77 for daily flow, 2.31 for mean monthly flow, and 2.46 for maximum monthly flow estimates) than the CNN models do (i.e., 2.78 for daily flow, 2.48 mean monthly flow, and 2.66 for maximum monthly flow estimates). The findings indicate that the AUGMDH model provides a more robust and reliable solution for riverine flood estimation, outperforming the CNN models across all major performance metrics, including accuracy, reliability, and computational efficiency.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 383
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), EM Strasbourg Business School (FR), Université Laval (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.