Units or Pounds? How Anchoring on Salient Price Information Influences Perceptions of Product Value

This research investigates how price format (unit-based, such as “$1 each,” vs. weight-based, such as “$2 per pound”) affects consumer perceptions of product value. When judging a product's value, grocery shoppers might consider how much they will have to pay in exchange for how much product (e.g., in pounds) they are getting. The findings show that when making this determination, shoppers anchor on the nominal value (e.g., $1, $2) of the most visually salient price that is displayed to them. As a result of this anchoring bias, perceived value is worse (i.e., less attractive) for lower-weight products (e.g., weighing less than one pound) when the most visually salient price is weight-based rather than unit-based (e.g., for a 1/2-lb product: $2.00 per pound < $1.00 each). In contrast, for higher-weight products (e.g., weighing more than one pound), weight-based pricing is perceived more favorably than unit-based pricing (e.g., for a 2-lb product: $2.00 per pound > $4.00 each). The authors provide evidence for this price format effect in a series of six studies, including two field studies examining real purchase behavior and sales.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marketing Research
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437251340367
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Units or Pounds? How Anchoring on Salient Price Information Influences Perceptions of Product Value

Sarah C. Whitley, Mathew S. Isaac, Julio Sevilla
4 citations
Journal of Marketing Research
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
8.43
article

Units or Pounds? How Anchoring on Salient Price Information Influences Perceptions of Product Value

Sarah C. Whitley, Mathew S. Isaac, Julio Sevilla
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This research investigates how price format (unit-based, such as “$1 each,” vs. weight-based, such as “$2 per pound”) affects consumer perceptions of product value. When judging a product's value, grocery shoppers might consider how much they will have to pay in exchange for how much product (e.g., in pounds) they are getting. The findings show that when making this determination, shoppers anchor on the nominal value (e.g., $1, $2) of the most visually salient price that is displayed to them. As a result of this anchoring bias, perceived value is worse (i.e., less attractive) for lower-weight products (e.g., weighing less than one pound) when the most visually salient price is weight-based rather than unit-based (e.g., for a 1/2-lb product: $2.00 per pound < $1.00 each). In contrast, for higher-weight products (e.g., weighing more than one pound), weight-based pricing is perceived more favorably than unit-based pricing (e.g., for a 2-lb product: $2.00 per pound > $4.00 each). The authors provide evidence for this price format effect in a series of six studies, including two field studies examining real purchase behavior and sales.

Journal of Marketing ResearchVol. 62(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
8.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.