A Commentary on Wolf and Stock-Homburg (2025): Rethinking the Ethics of Robotic Management

This commentary responds to Wolf and Stock-Homburg’s (2025) study on employee acceptance of robotic lower-level managers by foregrounding ethical considerations beyond competence-based evaluations. While their findings demonstrate that moderate robotic competence enhances acceptance, this commentary argues that ethical legitimacy requires more than acceptance—it necessitates the preservation of employee autonomy and the relational dimensions of leadership. Drawing on deontological and virtue ethics, the analysis critiques the risk of “algorithmic authoritarianism” and the erosion of ethical workplace relationships. The commentary advocates for hybrid human-AI managerial models that ensure human oversight, ethical accountability, and employee engagement. It concludes with recommendations for implementation strategies and future research directions exploring the ethical and organizational impacts of such models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group & Organization Management
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011251338600
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Commentary on Wolf and Stock-Homburg (2025): Rethinking the Ethics of Robotic Management

Piotr Zientara
1 citations
Group & Organization Management
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
article

A Commentary on Wolf and Stock-Homburg (2025): Rethinking the Ethics of Robotic Management

Piotr Zientara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This commentary responds to Wolf and Stock-Homburg’s (2025) study on employee acceptance of robotic lower-level managers by foregrounding ethical considerations beyond competence-based evaluations. While their findings demonstrate that moderate robotic competence enhances acceptance, this commentary argues that ethical legitimacy requires more than acceptance—it necessitates the preservation of employee autonomy and the relational dimensions of leadership. Drawing on deontological and virtue ethics, the analysis critiques the risk of “algorithmic authoritarianism” and the erosion of ethical workplace relationships. The commentary advocates for hybrid human-AI managerial models that ensure human oversight, ethical accountability, and employee engagement. It concludes with recommendations for implementation strategies and future research directions exploring the ethical and organizational impacts of such models.

Group & Organization Management
University of Gdańsk (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.