Encountering Friction, Understanding Crises: How Do Digital Natives Make Sense of Crisis Maps?

Crisis maps are regarded as crucial tools in crisis communication, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change crises. However, there is limited understanding of how public audiences engage with these maps and extract essential information. Our study investigates the sensemaking of young, digitally native viewers as they interact with crisis maps. We integrate frameworks from the learning sciences and human-data interaction to explore sensemaking through two empirical studies: a thematic analysis of online comments from a New York Times series on graph comprehension, and interviews with 18 participants from German-speaking regions. Our analysis categorizes sensemaking activities into established clusters: inspecting, engaging with content, and placing, and introduces responding personally to capture the affective dimension. We identify friction points connected to these clusters, including struggles with color concepts, responses to missing context, lack of personal connection, and distrust, offering insights for improving crisis communication to public audiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713520
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encountering Friction, Understanding Crises: How Do Digital Natives Make Sense of Crisis Maps?

Kathleen Gregory, Laura Koesten, Antonia Saske, Sandra Maria Starchenko
1 citations
Geographic Information Systems Studies
6.72
article

Encountering Friction, Understanding Crises: How Do Digital Natives Make Sense of Crisis Maps?

Kathleen Gregory, Laura Koesten, Antonia Saske, Sandra Maria Starchenko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Crisis maps are regarded as crucial tools in crisis communication, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change crises. However, there is limited understanding of how public audiences engage with these maps and extract essential information. Our study investigates the sensemaking of young, digitally native viewers as they interact with crisis maps. We integrate frameworks from the learning sciences and human-data interaction to explore sensemaking through two empirical studies: a thematic analysis of online comments from a New York Times series on graph comprehension, and interviews with 18 participants from German-speaking regions. Our analysis categorizes sensemaking activities into established clusters: inspecting, engaging with content, and placing, and introduces responding personally to capture the affective dimension. We identify friction points connected to these clusters, including struggles with color concepts, responses to missing context, lack of personal connection, and distrust, offering insights for improving crisis communication to public audiences.

Leiden University (NL), University of Vienna (AT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
6.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Encountering Friction, Understanding Crises: How Do Digital Natives Make Sense of Crisis Maps? — Kathleen Gregory, Laura Koesten, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS