Preventing Harmful Data Practices by using Participatory Input to Navigate the Machine Learning Multiverse

In light of inherent trade-offs regarding fairness, privacy, interpretability and performance, as well as normative questions, the machine learning (ML) pipeline needs to be made accessible for public input, critical reflection and engagement of diverse stakeholders.In this work, we introduce a participatory approach to gather input from the general public on the design of an ML pipeline. We show how people’s input can be used to navigate and constrain the multiverse of decisions during both model development and evaluation. We highlight that central design decisions should be democratized rather than “optimized” to acknowledge their critical impact on the system’s output downstream. We describe the iterative development of our approach and its exemplary implementation on a citizen science platform. Our results demonstrate how public participation can inform critical design decisions along the model-building pipeline and combat widespread lazy data practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713482
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preventing Harmful Data Practices by using Participatory Input to Navigate the Machine Learning Multiverse

Fiona Draxler, Jan Simson, Christoph A. Kern, Samuel A. Mehr
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Preventing Harmful Data Practices by using Participatory Input to Navigate the Machine Learning Multiverse

Fiona Draxler, Jan Simson, Christoph A. Kern, Samuel A. Mehr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In light of inherent trade-offs regarding fairness, privacy, interpretability and performance, as well as normative questions, the machine learning (ML) pipeline needs to be made accessible for public input, critical reflection and engagement of diverse stakeholders.In this work, we introduce a participatory approach to gather input from the general public on the design of an ML pipeline. We show how people’s input can be used to navigate and constrain the multiverse of decisions during both model development and evaluation. We highlight that central design decisions should be democratized rather than “optimized” to acknowledge their critical impact on the system’s output downstream. We describe the iterative development of our approach and its exemplary implementation on a citizen science platform. Our results demonstrate how public participation can inform critical design decisions along the model-building pipeline and combat widespread lazy data practices.

University of Auckland (NZ), University of Mannheim (DE), Munich School of Philosophy (DE), Yale University (US), Munich Center for Machine Learning, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preventing Harmful Data Practices by using Participatory Input to Navigate the Machine Learning Multiverse — Fiona Draxler, Jan Simson, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS