Recruitment Sources and Retention Outcomes in Domestic and Foreign‐Owned Firms in Japan: A Human Capital Perspective

ABSTRACT While recruiting and retention are core human resource management functions, little attention has been given to their contextual differences in domestic and foreign‐owned firms. We draw on human capital theory and used a mixed‐methods approach—(1) time‐lagged surveys with 755 employees and (2) semi‐structured interviews with 110 managers, headhunters, and employees—to examine recruiting and turnover in domestic and foreign‐owned firms in Japan. Our findings demonstrate significant differences in recruiting sources and turnover‐related outcomes between these firms, partly due to the more extensive use of headhunters and recruitment of host country national employees with higher general human capital in foreign‐owned firms. Our arguments and empirical evidence contribute to the literature by challenging the assumptions of human capital theory, emphasizing the role of context, and providing insights into the underlying reasons for turnover differences between domestic and foreign‐owned firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Management Journal
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12605
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human Resource and Talent Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recruitment Sources and Retention Outcomes in Domestic and Foreign‐Owned Firms in Japan: A Human Capital Perspective

Fabian Jintae Froese, Vesa Peltokorpi
2 citations
Human Resource Management Journal
Human Resource and Talent Management
5.53
article

Recruitment Sources and Retention Outcomes in Domestic and Foreign‐Owned Firms in Japan: A Human Capital Perspective

Fabian Jintae Froese, Vesa Peltokorpi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT While recruiting and retention are core human resource management functions, little attention has been given to their contextual differences in domestic and foreign‐owned firms. We draw on human capital theory and used a mixed‐methods approach—(1) time‐lagged surveys with 755 employees and (2) semi‐structured interviews with 110 managers, headhunters, and employees—to examine recruiting and turnover in domestic and foreign‐owned firms in Japan. Our findings demonstrate significant differences in recruiting sources and turnover‐related outcomes between these firms, partly due to the more extensive use of headhunters and recruitment of host country national employees with higher general human capital in foreign‐owned firms. Our arguments and empirical evidence contribute to the literature by challenging the assumptions of human capital theory, emphasizing the role of context, and providing insights into the underlying reasons for turnover differences between domestic and foreign‐owned firms.

Human Resource Management JournalVol. 35(4)
Hiroshima University (JP), University of Leeds (GB), University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Human Resource and Talent Management
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.