Homes under the microscope: results from a pilot community science approach to measure airborne microfibres in the home

Non-natural airborne microfibres are an emerging concern in indoor air pollution, yet relatively little is known about their sources or concentrations. This is particularly relevant in home environments, where individuals spend significant amounts of time, but which are challenging for researchers to access at scale. Consequently, the concentration of indoor airborne microfibres remains poorly constrained. This paper presents results from the pilot phase of a participatory community (or citizen) science project, where participants collected airborne microfibres in their homes using simple, low-cost passive samplers consisting of Petri dishes lined with forensic tape. Microfibre deposition rates were then quantified through a combination of participant-contributed microscopy images and laboratory-based manual counting. The study found an average indoor microfibre deposition rate of 1,960 fibres m -2 day -1 , with significant variability between homes (mean rates ranging from 570 to 4,534 fibres m -2 day -1 ). Among rooms sampled, bedrooms had the highest deposition rates (2,893 fibres m -2 day -1 ), followed by bathrooms (2,482 fibres m -2 day -1 ), with kitchens (1,225 fibres m -2 day -1 ) and living rooms (942 fibres m -2 day -1 ) showing lower rates. This study demonstrates a scalable, community-driven method for measuring indoor microfibres in the built environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Built Environment
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1556698
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Homes under the microscope: results from a pilot community science approach to measure airborne microfibres in the home

Alexandra R. McGoran, K. J. Pringle, Sophie Laggan, Ben Williams et al.
Frontiers in Built Environment
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Homes under the microscope: results from a pilot community science approach to measure airborne microfibres in the home

Alexandra R. McGoran, K. J. Pringle, Sophie Laggan, Ben Williams, Mark Hansen, Timothy M. Cox, Ana Margarida Sardo, Laura De Vito, Kathryn Lamb-Riddell
article en

Abstract

Non-natural airborne microfibres are an emerging concern in indoor air pollution, yet relatively little is known about their sources or concentrations. This is particularly relevant in home environments, where individuals spend significant amounts of time, but which are challenging for researchers to access at scale. Consequently, the concentration of indoor airborne microfibres remains poorly constrained. This paper presents results from the pilot phase of a participatory community (or citizen) science project, where participants collected airborne microfibres in their homes using simple, low-cost passive samplers consisting of Petri dishes lined with forensic tape. Microfibre deposition rates were then quantified through a combination of participant-contributed microscopy images and laboratory-based manual counting. The study found an average indoor microfibre deposition rate of 1,960 fibres m -2 day -1 , with significant variability between homes (mean rates ranging from 570 to 4,534 fibres m -2 day -1 ). Among rooms sampled, bedrooms had the highest deposition rates (2,893 fibres m -2 day -1 ), followed by bathrooms (2,482 fibres m -2 day -1 ), with kitchens (1,225 fibres m -2 day -1 ) and living rooms (942 fibres m -2 day -1 ) showing lower rates. This study demonstrates a scalable, community-driven method for measuring indoor microfibres in the built environment.

Frontiers in Built EnvironmentVol. 11
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB), University of the West of England (GB), Bristol Robotics Laboratory (GB), Institute of Bio-Sensing Technology (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.