Good Performance Isn't Enough to Trust AI: Lessons from Logistics Experts on their Long-Term Collaboration with an AI Planning System

While research on trust in human-AI interactions is gaining recognition, much work is conducted in lab settings that, therefore, lack ecological validity and often omit the trust development perspective. We investigated a real-world case in which logistics experts had worked with an AI system for several years (in some cases since its introduction). Through thematic analysis, three key themes emerged: First, although experts clearly point out AI system imperfections, they still showed to develop trust over time. Second, however, inconsistencies and frequent efforts to improve the AI system disrupted trust development, hindering control, transparency, and understanding of the system. Finally, despite the overall trustworthiness, experts overrode correct AI decisions to protect their colleagues’ well-being. By comparing our results with the latest trust research, we can confirm empirical work and contribute new perspectives, such as understanding the importance of human elements for trust development in human-AI scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713099
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Good Performance Isn't Enough to Trust AI: Lessons from Logistics Experts on their Long-Term Collaboration with an AI Planning System

Patricia Kahr, Chris Snijders, Gerrit Rooks, Martijn C. Willemsen
7 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
16.56
article

Good Performance Isn't Enough to Trust AI: Lessons from Logistics Experts on their Long-Term Collaboration with an AI Planning System

Patricia Kahr, Chris Snijders, Gerrit Rooks, Martijn C. Willemsen
article en
7 citations

Abstract

While research on trust in human-AI interactions is gaining recognition, much work is conducted in lab settings that, therefore, lack ecological validity and often omit the trust development perspective. We investigated a real-world case in which logistics experts had worked with an AI system for several years (in some cases since its introduction). Through thematic analysis, three key themes emerged: First, although experts clearly point out AI system imperfections, they still showed to develop trust over time. Second, however, inconsistencies and frequent efforts to improve the AI system disrupted trust development, hindering control, transparency, and understanding of the system. Finally, despite the overall trustworthiness, experts overrode correct AI decisions to protect their colleagues’ well-being. By comparing our results with the latest trust research, we can confirm empirical work and contribute new perspectives, such as understanding the importance of human elements for trust development in human-AI scenarios.

Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
16.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.