Predictive validity of the SAD PERSONS and NO HOPE scales in a sample of suicide cases

The SAD PERSONS scale has limitations in effectively predicting suicide risk, particularly due to its focus on non-modifiable factors. Adding variables from the NO HOPE scale improves predictive utility. Comprehensive clinical assessments, considering psychological, social, and environmental factors, are essential for accurate suicide risk evaluation and tailored intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1554971
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive validity of the SAD PERSONS and NO HOPE scales in a sample of suicide cases

Lucas Giner, Julio A. Guija, Jorge L. Ordóñez-Carrasco, Sergio Sanz‐Gómez et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
2.31
article

Predictive validity of the SAD PERSONS and NO HOPE scales in a sample of suicide cases

Lucas Giner, Julio A. Guija, Jorge L. Ordóñez-Carrasco, Sergio Sanz‐Gómez, Adrián Alacreu‐Crespo, María Isabel Perea-González, Diego De La Vega-Sánchez, Aida Castell-Navarro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The SAD PERSONS scale has limitations in effectively predicting suicide risk, particularly due to its focus on non-modifiable factors. Adding variables from the NO HOPE scale improves predictive utility. Comprehensive clinical assessments, considering psychological, social, and environmental factors, are essential for accurate suicide risk evaluation and tailored intervention.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES), Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla (ES), IVI Sevilla Clinic (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, Universidad de Sevilla
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Predictive validity of the SAD PERSONS and NO HOPE scales in a sample of suicide cases — Lucas Giner, Julio A. Guija, et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS