Assessing Latent Risk Based on Joint Modelling of Multiple Health Insurance Outcomes of Mixed Types

ABSTRACT Our research is motivated by an insurance study involving 788 insurance subscribers who made claims resulting from ischemic heart disease. Four different types of health services used by these subscribers as well as the corresponding total cost were observed for two years. Health care utilizations vary a lot even for subscribers of the same personal characteristics. The research question of primary interest is how to capture patient‐specific latent risks beyond what can be explained by known personal characteristics. In this study, we characterize unobserved latent risks by random effects in our joint Tweedie mixed models for multiple health outcomes of mixed types. An optimal estimation of our model has been developed using the orthodox best linear unbiased predictors of random effects. Our approach is illustrated with the analysis of the health insurance study of 788 ischemic heart disease patients. Applying cluster analysis to the patient‐specific latent risks predicted by our model, we were able to classify patients into a high risk group of 36 patients, a medium risk group of 256 patients and a low risk group of 496 patients. The finding is of important policy relevance since the losses suffered by a few are known to be spread over many in an insurance system. Grouping of patients and prioritization of specific groups based on subject‐specific latent risks facilitates resource allocation and pricing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.70012
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Latent Risk Based on Joint Modelling of Multiple Health Insurance Outcomes of Mixed Types

Renjun Ma, Xingde Duan
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Assessing Latent Risk Based on Joint Modelling of Multiple Health Insurance Outcomes of Mixed Types

Renjun Ma, Xingde Duan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Our research is motivated by an insurance study involving 788 insurance subscribers who made claims resulting from ischemic heart disease. Four different types of health services used by these subscribers as well as the corresponding total cost were observed for two years. Health care utilizations vary a lot even for subscribers of the same personal characteristics. The research question of primary interest is how to capture patient‐specific latent risks beyond what can be explained by known personal characteristics. In this study, we characterize unobserved latent risks by random effects in our joint Tweedie mixed models for multiple health outcomes of mixed types. An optimal estimation of our model has been developed using the orthodox best linear unbiased predictors of random effects. Our approach is illustrated with the analysis of the health insurance study of 788 ischemic heart disease patients. Applying cluster analysis to the patient‐specific latent risks predicted by our model, we were able to classify patients into a high risk group of 36 patients, a medium risk group of 256 patients and a low risk group of 496 patients. The finding is of important policy relevance since the losses suffered by a few are known to be spread over many in an insurance system. Grouping of patients and prioritization of specific groups based on subject‐specific latent risks facilitates resource allocation and pricing.

Applied Stochastic Models in Business and IndustryVol. 41(3)
University of New Brunswick (CA), Guizhou University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.