Validation for Personalized Assessments: A Threats‐to‐Validity Approach

Abstract Personalized assessments are of increasing interest because of their potential to lead to more equitable decisions about the examinees. However, one obstacle to the widespread use of personalized assessments is the lack of a measurement toolkit that can be used to analyze data from these assessments. This article takes one step toward building such a toolkit by proposing a validation framework for personalized assessments. The framework is built on the threats‐to‐validity approach. We demonstrate applications of the suggested framework using the AP 3D Art and Design Portfolio examination and a more restrictive culturally relevant assessment as examples.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Measurement
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12434
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Art Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
53.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation for Personalized Assessments: A Threats‐to‐Validity Approach

Jesse R. Sparks, Sandip Sinharay, Michael T. Kane, Randy Elliot Bennett
2 citations
Journal of Educational Measurement
Art Education and Development
53.86
article

Validation for Personalized Assessments: A Threats‐to‐Validity Approach

Jesse R. Sparks, Sandip Sinharay, Michael T. Kane, Randy Elliot Bennett
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Personalized assessments are of increasing interest because of their potential to lead to more equitable decisions about the examinees. However, one obstacle to the widespread use of personalized assessments is the lack of a measurement toolkit that can be used to analyze data from these assessments. This article takes one step toward building such a toolkit by proposing a validation framework for personalized assessments. The framework is built on the threats‐to‐validity approach. We demonstrate applications of the suggested framework using the AP 3D Art and Design Portfolio examination and a more restrictive culturally relevant assessment as examples.

Journal of Educational MeasurementVol. 62(2)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Art Education and Development
53.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.