"Why do we do this?": Moral Stress and the Affective Experience of Ethics in Practice

A plethora of toolkits, checklists, and workshops have been developed to bridge the well-documented gap between AI ethics principles and practice. Yet little is known about effects of such interventions on practitioners. We conducted an ethnographic investigation in a major European city organization that developed and works to integrate an ethics toolkit into city operations. We find that the integration of ethics tools by technical teams desta-bilises their boundaries, roles, and mandates around responsibilities and decisions. This lead to emotional discomfort and feelings of vulnerability, which neither toolkit designers nor the organization had accounted for.We leverage the concept of moral stress to argue that this affective experience is a core challenge to the successful integration of ethics tools in technical practice. Even in this best case scenario, organisational structures were not able to deal with moral stress that resulted from attempts to implement responsible technology development practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713264
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Why do we do this?": Moral Stress and the Affective Experience of Ethics in Practice

Irina Shklovski, Marco C. Rozendaal, Ville Vakkuri, Sonja Rattay
3 citations
Ethics in medical practice
8.45
article

"Why do we do this?": Moral Stress and the Affective Experience of Ethics in Practice

Irina Shklovski, Marco C. Rozendaal, Ville Vakkuri, Sonja Rattay
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A plethora of toolkits, checklists, and workshops have been developed to bridge the well-documented gap between AI ethics principles and practice. Yet little is known about effects of such interventions on practitioners. We conducted an ethnographic investigation in a major European city organization that developed and works to integrate an ethics toolkit into city operations. We find that the integration of ethics tools by technical teams desta-bilises their boundaries, roles, and mandates around responsibilities and decisions. This lead to emotional discomfort and feelings of vulnerability, which neither toolkit designers nor the organization had accounted for.We leverage the concept of moral stress to argue that this affective experience is a core challenge to the successful integration of ethics tools in technical practice. Even in this best case scenario, organisational structures were not able to deal with moral stress that resulted from attempts to implement responsible technology development practices.

Linköping University (SE), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Vaasa (FI), IT University of Copenhagen (DK), Delft University of Technology (NL)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics in medical practice
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

"Why do we do this?": Moral Stress and the Affective Experience of Ethics in Practice — Irina Shklovski, Marco C. Rozendaal, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS