Metacognitive sensitivity: The key to calibrating trust and optimal decision making with AI

Knowing when to trust and incorporate the advice from artificially intelligent (AI) systems is of increasing importance in the modern world. Research indicates that when AI provides high confidence ratings, human users often correspondingly increase their trust in such judgments, but these increases in trust can occur even when AI fails to provide accurate information on a given task. In this piece, we argue that measures of metacognitive sensitivity provided by AI systems will likely play a critical role in (1) helping individuals to calibrate their level of trust in these systems and (2) optimally incorporating advice from AI into human-AI hybrid decision making. We draw upon a seminal finding in the perceptual decision-making literature that demonstrates the importance of metacognitive ratings for optimal joint decisions and outline a framework to test how different types of information provided by AI systems can guide decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf133
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metacognitive sensitivity: The key to calibrating trust and optimal decision making with AI

Jing Du, Tianyu Zhou, Brian Odegaard, Doyeon Lee et al.
7 citations
PNAS Nexus
Cognitive Science and Mapping
17.37
article

Metacognitive sensitivity: The key to calibrating trust and optimal decision making with AI

Jing Du, Tianyu Zhou, Brian Odegaard, Doyeon Lee, Joseph Pruitt
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Knowing when to trust and incorporate the advice from artificially intelligent (AI) systems is of increasing importance in the modern world. Research indicates that when AI provides high confidence ratings, human users often correspondingly increase their trust in such judgments, but these increases in trust can occur even when AI fails to provide accurate information on a given task. In this piece, we argue that measures of metacognitive sensitivity provided by AI systems will likely play a critical role in (1) helping individuals to calibrate their level of trust in these systems and (2) optimally incorporating advice from AI into human-AI hybrid decision making. We draw upon a seminal finding in the perceptual decision-making literature that demonstrates the importance of metacognitive ratings for optimal joint decisions and outline a framework to test how different types of information provided by AI systems can guide decision making.

PNAS NexusVol. 4(5)
University of Florida (US)
Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
17.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Metacognitive sensitivity: The key to calibrating trust and optimal decision making with AI — Jing Du, Tianyu Zhou, et al. · PNAS Nexus (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS