Can the effects of generative drawing on lasting learning be optimized through integration of retrieval practice?

Creating drawings to depict the content of an expository text triggers generative processes that contribute to the construction of coherent mental models and thus improves comprehension. However, the triggered generative processes scarcely contribute to consolidation of the mental models in memory. Hence, a promising means to optimize drawing in terms of lasting learning is incorporating retrieval practice, which has been shown to serve a robust consolidation function. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether incorporating retrieval practice into drawing would foster lasting learning. Participants were N = 308 students. After reading an expository text, students were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In the closed-then-open-book condition, learners first created their drawings without access to the text and hence were required to retrieve the previously read information from memory. Afterwards, they were asked to revise their drawings with access to the text. In the open-book condition, learners could access the text in all phases. Learning outcomes were assessed two and eight weeks later. The closed-then-open-book drawing was not superior in terms of learning outcomes. Mediation analyses suggest that the closed-then-open-book format fostered learning via increased retrieval practice but at the same time hindered learning via decreased mental model quality. Implementing drawing in a closed-then-open-book format could in principle be a fruitful means to optimize drawing in terms of lasting learning. However, instructional support which ensures that mental model quality is not compromised is needed to exploit its full potential. • We incorporated retrieval practice into generative drawing through closed-book phases. • Open-book and closed-then-open-book generative drawing were compared. • The two formats did not differ regarding learning outcomes after 2 and 8 weeks. • Open-book drawing fostered learning via enhanced mental model quality. • Closed-then-open-book drawing fostered learning via increased retrieval practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Instruction
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102143
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can the effects of generative drawing on lasting learning be optimized through integration of retrieval practice?

Detlev Leutner, Julian Roelle, Seokyoung Kim, Roman Abel et al.
3 citations
Learning and Instruction
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
6.35
article

Can the effects of generative drawing on lasting learning be optimized through integration of retrieval practice?

Detlev Leutner, Julian Roelle, Seokyoung Kim, Roman Abel, Philipp Schmiemann
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Creating drawings to depict the content of an expository text triggers generative processes that contribute to the construction of coherent mental models and thus improves comprehension. However, the triggered generative processes scarcely contribute to consolidation of the mental models in memory. Hence, a promising means to optimize drawing in terms of lasting learning is incorporating retrieval practice, which has been shown to serve a robust consolidation function. The goal of the present study was to investigate whether incorporating retrieval practice into drawing would foster lasting learning. Participants were N = 308 students. After reading an expository text, students were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In the closed-then-open-book condition, learners first created their drawings without access to the text and hence were required to retrieve the previously read information from memory. Afterwards, they were asked to revise their drawings with access to the text. In the open-book condition, learners could access the text in all phases. Learning outcomes were assessed two and eight weeks later. The closed-then-open-book drawing was not superior in terms of learning outcomes. Mediation analyses suggest that the closed-then-open-book format fostered learning via increased retrieval practice but at the same time hindered learning via decreased mental model quality. Implementing drawing in a closed-then-open-book format could in principle be a fruitful means to optimize drawing in terms of lasting learning. However, instructional support which ensures that mental model quality is not compromised is needed to exploit its full potential. • We incorporated retrieval practice into generative drawing through closed-book phases. • Open-book and closed-then-open-book generative drawing were compared. • The two formats did not differ regarding learning outcomes after 2 and 8 weeks. • Open-book drawing fostered learning via enhanced mental model quality. • Closed-then-open-book drawing fostered learning via increased retrieval practice.

Learning and InstructionVol. 98
University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
6.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.