Toward cross‐disciplinary translation of the testing effect: A systematic replication

The testing effect is a well-established phenomenon in cognitive psychology that refers to enhanced long-term retention of information due to active recalling through testing. Following a cross-disciplinary translation of the testing effect into behavioral principles, we systematically replicated the previous findings in a behavior-analytic context while evaluating the effects of the number of quiz questions on college students' exam performance and other academic behaviors. Students in an upper-level behavior analysis course participated. Using a within-subject experimental design in which the participants served as their own control, we compared their exam performance and academic behaviors, such as class participation and out-of-class studying, across three conditions: (a) no quizzes, (b) 5-question quizzes, and (c) 10-question quizzes. Quizzes improved exam performance and some academic behaviors, successfully replicating the testing effect in a behavior-analytic context. However, the number of quiz questions did not influence the improvements. Implications of the results and future research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.70012
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward cross‐disciplinary translation of the testing effect: A systematic replication

Kathryn R. Glodowski, Yusuke Hayashi
1 links
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Toward cross‐disciplinary translation of the testing effect: A systematic replication

Kathryn R. Glodowski, Yusuke Hayashi
article en

Abstract

The testing effect is a well-established phenomenon in cognitive psychology that refers to enhanced long-term retention of information due to active recalling through testing. Following a cross-disciplinary translation of the testing effect into behavioral principles, we systematically replicated the previous findings in a behavior-analytic context while evaluating the effects of the number of quiz questions on college students' exam performance and other academic behaviors. Students in an upper-level behavior analysis course participated. Using a within-subject experimental design in which the participants served as their own control, we compared their exam performance and academic behaviors, such as class participation and out-of-class studying, across three conditions: (a) no quizzes, (b) 5-question quizzes, and (c) 10-question quizzes. Quizzes improved exam performance and some academic behaviors, successfully replicating the testing effect in a behavior-analytic context. However, the number of quiz questions did not influence the improvements. Implications of the results and future research are discussed.

Journal of Applied Behavior AnalysisVol. 58(3)
Mary Baldwin University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward cross‐disciplinary translation of the testing effect: A systematic replication — Kathryn R. Glodowski, Yusuke Hayashi · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS