Muslim residential concentrations in two largest Australian cities: who is concerned about them and why?

This paper explores attitudes towards Muslims concentration areas in Sydney and Melbourne, two largest Australian cities. Survey data is used (N=1020), collected online and by phone, from people who lived in either ‘metro areas’ (within metropolitan Sydney or Melbourne) or in ‘target areas’, designated as Muslim concentrations based on census data. We analyze quantitative data to establish how attitudes towards Muslims residential concentrations relate to demographic, socio-economic and residential characteristics of respondents. Our data show that a typical ‘concerned citizen’ can be described as older, Christian, lower-educated, unsatisfied with their income and living outside Muslim concentrations. We use qualitative data (open-ended narrative responses) to elucidate why people hold Islamophobic views and how they justify them. We find that non-Muslims who live outside Muslim concentration areas are more concerned about them than those who reside in them and therefore encounter Muslims on a daily basis. This finding supports the ‘contact theory’ of ethnic relations. The article contributes to the body of research into Islamophobia in Western countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methodology Insight
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71290/mi01010002
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Muslim residential concentrations in two largest Australian cities: who is concerned about them and why?

Adrian P. Flitney, Val Colic‐Peisker
1 links
Methodology Insight
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Muslim residential concentrations in two largest Australian cities: who is concerned about them and why?

Adrian P. Flitney, Val Colic‐Peisker
article en

Abstract

This paper explores attitudes towards Muslims concentration areas in Sydney and Melbourne, two largest Australian cities. Survey data is used (N=1020), collected online and by phone, from people who lived in either ‘metro areas’ (within metropolitan Sydney or Melbourne) or in ‘target areas’, designated as Muslim concentrations based on census data. We analyze quantitative data to establish how attitudes towards Muslims residential concentrations relate to demographic, socio-economic and residential characteristics of respondents. Our data show that a typical ‘concerned citizen’ can be described as older, Christian, lower-educated, unsatisfied with their income and living outside Muslim concentrations. We use qualitative data (open-ended narrative responses) to elucidate why people hold Islamophobic views and how they justify them. We find that non-Muslims who live outside Muslim concentration areas are more concerned about them than those who reside in them and therefore encounter Muslims on a daily basis. This finding supports the ‘contact theory’ of ethnic relations. The article contributes to the body of research into Islamophobia in Western countries.

Methodology InsightVol. 1(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Strong, Department of Social Services, Australian Government, RMIT University
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Muslim residential concentrations in two largest Australian cities: who is concerned about them and why? — Adrian P. Flitney, Val Colic‐Peisker · Methodology Insight (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS