QUO VADIS PROCEDURAL LAW OF POSITIVE FICTITIOUS APPLICATION TO OBTAIN A DECISION AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT

In modern governance, state administrative decisions (KTUN) play an important role as an administrative tool to support the implementation of government functions that have been regulated in the State Administrative Justice Law. The authority of the State Administrative Court to examine, hear and decide on positive fictitious applications is eliminated or replaced, the authority will be further regulated in a presidential regulation but until now the presidential regulation has not been issued and causes legal uncertainty or legal vacuum. As a normative legal research with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, this article aims to examine how the transformation of the concept of positive fictitious, analyze its impact on legal certainty, and offer alternative policies to overcome the legal vacuum in the application of positive fictitious mechanisms in Indonesia by comparing it with France and the Netherlands. Conclusively, the research results in this article show that after the enactment of the Job Creation Law, the concept of positive fictitious decision application has undergone a major change, namely the elimination of the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN). In addition, this paper also compares the implementation of similar mechanisms in several other countries to find perspectives that can be adopted. In the context of the rule of law and welfare state, the government must optimize its role to ensure public access to fair and transparent administrative decisions.