An evaluation of global LULC maps for the estimation of habitat use of a declining migratory waterbird along its flyway

Global products of land use and land cover (LULC) provide maps with a consistent classification, thereby allowing for comparisons of resource and habitat use of species over large spatial scales. While global LULCs tend to be evaluated extensively, the distribution ranges of species can extend into remote areas that are hard to access for ground truthing. It is unclear how adequate global LULCs are for mapping habitat of long-distance migrants throughout their entire range. Here, we investigated whether different global LULCs could successfully capture the known preferences of a migratory wetland specialist, the Eurasian wigeon ( Mareca penelope ), along the East Atlantic flyway. We evaluated how well five different global LULC products captured known wigeon habitat preferences using remote tracking data, and tested whether a further classification based on wetland expert knowledge can improve on their performance. We found that average performance of global LULC products varied greatly, with ESA WorldCover performing best with a 94% correspondence to wigeon habitat. All products performed best in the Tundra biome, and worse in Boreal as well as Temperate forests. In the latter areas, our wetland expert LULC classification provided improved results by explicitly considering small and temporary wetlands, and wetlands underneath vegetation. Overall, habitat use of habitat specialists can inform us about habitat types that are currently not considered in large-scale LULC maps. We suggest LULC mapping methods integrate information from tracking of wetland specialists for a better detection of small and temporary wetlands on a global scale. • Eurasians wigeons spend most of their time in proximity to aquatic habitats. • Habitat preferences are constant across the entire migratory flyway. • Global LULC maps do not accurately represent wigeon habitat use. • Small, temporary, and wetlands underneath vegetation remain undetected in LULC maps. • Remote tracking of habitat specialists can inform habitat mapping and prioritisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111152
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evaluation of global LULC maps for the estimation of habitat use of a declining migratory waterbird along its flyway

Céline Arzel, Mariëlle Liduine van Toor, Jonas Waldenström, Aurélie Davranche et al.
Biological Conservation
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

An evaluation of global LULC maps for the estimation of habitat use of a declining migratory waterbird along its flyway

Céline Arzel, Mariëlle Liduine van Toor, Jonas Waldenström, Aurélie Davranche, Gabriel Delaunay, Clément Murgue
article en

Abstract

Global products of land use and land cover (LULC) provide maps with a consistent classification, thereby allowing for comparisons of resource and habitat use of species over large spatial scales. While global LULCs tend to be evaluated extensively, the distribution ranges of species can extend into remote areas that are hard to access for ground truthing. It is unclear how adequate global LULCs are for mapping habitat of long-distance migrants throughout their entire range. Here, we investigated whether different global LULCs could successfully capture the known preferences of a migratory wetland specialist, the Eurasian wigeon ( Mareca penelope ), along the East Atlantic flyway. We evaluated how well five different global LULC products captured known wigeon habitat preferences using remote tracking data, and tested whether a further classification based on wetland expert knowledge can improve on their performance. We found that average performance of global LULC products varied greatly, with ESA WorldCover performing best with a 94% correspondence to wigeon habitat. All products performed best in the Tundra biome, and worse in Boreal as well as Temperate forests. In the latter areas, our wetland expert LULC classification provided improved results by explicitly considering small and temporary wetlands, and wetlands underneath vegetation. Overall, habitat use of habitat specialists can inform us about habitat types that are currently not considered in large-scale LULC maps. We suggest LULC mapping methods integrate information from tracking of wetland specialists for a better detection of small and temporary wetlands on a global scale. • Eurasians wigeons spend most of their time in proximity to aquatic habitats. • Habitat preferences are constant across the entire migratory flyway. • Global LULC maps do not accurately represent wigeon habitat use. • Small, temporary, and wetlands underneath vegetation remain undetected in LULC maps. • Remote tracking of habitat specialists can inform habitat mapping and prioritisation.

Biological ConservationVol. 307
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Turku (FI), Altran (France) (FR), Linnaeus University (SE), Université Rennes 2 (FR), Littoral, Environnement, Télédétection, Géomatique (FR), Université d'Angers (FR), Université de Rennes (FR)
KONE, European Commission, Academy of Finland, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Koneen Säätiö, Linnéuniversitetet, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Horizon 2020, Institut écologie et environnement
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.