Norwegian sheep farmers’ perception of the advantages and disadvantages of Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies

Despite enthusiastic industry and policy developments around Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technology, it is unclear how often the development of new tools is centred around farmers' needs and means. This study aimed to identify the perceived benefits and disadvantages of PLF technology on Norwegian sheep farms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 Norwegian sheep farmers who use one or more PLF tool. Participants were between 35 and 70 years old, were from three Norwegian regions and farmed between 20 and 400 ewes. The most used technologies were GPS collars monitoring sheep location and registration software. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and six themes were identified: Resources and Savings, Gaining Control, The User Experience, The Human-Animal Relationship, Trust in Technology and Stewards of the Land. The identified advantages of technology use were time, energy and economic savings that lightened farmers' cognitive burden, offered an increased sense of control gained through access to new data, an improved relationship between the farmers and their sheep, and an increased ability to preserve their farming lifestyle and the land they farm on. However, these benefits were not unanimously agreed upon, with many participants suggesting that the economic costs outweighed the time and energy savings, that farmers’ cognitive burden actually increased, that sellers and digital information could be untrustworthy and that technology posed a risk to the quality of the human-animal relationship. These findings could inform the future development and applications of user-centric PLF products to support the resilience of farming communities. • Time and energy savings motivated Norwegian sheep farmers to purchase PLF technology. •PLF increased farmers' control, improving their human-animal relationship. •Economic cost was the largest barrier to technology uptake and use. •Technical faults and poor customer support led to reduced trust in sellers. •Farmers invested in technology to ensure the longevity of their farming lifestyle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103684
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Norwegian sheep farmers’ perception of the advantages and disadvantages of Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies

Lise Grøva, Michelle C. Reeves, Catherine M Dwyer, Lesley Jessiman
2 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
4.71
article

Norwegian sheep farmers’ perception of the advantages and disadvantages of Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies

Lise Grøva, Michelle C. Reeves, Catherine M Dwyer, Lesley Jessiman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite enthusiastic industry and policy developments around Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technology, it is unclear how often the development of new tools is centred around farmers' needs and means. This study aimed to identify the perceived benefits and disadvantages of PLF technology on Norwegian sheep farms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 Norwegian sheep farmers who use one or more PLF tool. Participants were between 35 and 70 years old, were from three Norwegian regions and farmed between 20 and 400 ewes. The most used technologies were GPS collars monitoring sheep location and registration software. Interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and six themes were identified: Resources and Savings, Gaining Control, The User Experience, The Human-Animal Relationship, Trust in Technology and Stewards of the Land. The identified advantages of technology use were time, energy and economic savings that lightened farmers' cognitive burden, offered an increased sense of control gained through access to new data, an improved relationship between the farmers and their sheep, and an increased ability to preserve their farming lifestyle and the land they farm on. However, these benefits were not unanimously agreed upon, with many participants suggesting that the economic costs outweighed the time and energy savings, that farmers’ cognitive burden actually increased, that sellers and digital information could be untrustworthy and that technology posed a risk to the quality of the human-animal relationship. These findings could inform the future development and applications of user-centric PLF products to support the resilience of farming communities. • Time and energy savings motivated Norwegian sheep farmers to purchase PLF technology. •PLF increased farmers' control, improving their human-animal relationship. •Economic cost was the largest barrier to technology uptake and use. •Technical faults and poor customer support led to reduced trust in sellers. •Farmers invested in technology to ensure the longevity of their farming lifestyle.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 117
Roslin Institute (GB), Scotland's Rural College (GB), Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
4.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.