AI-empowered Qualitative Data Analysis

Advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) are transforming qualitative data analysis in public health research. By enhancing the efficiency and scalability of data analyses, AI-empowered tools allow researchers to handle larger datasets (i.e. interview transcripts) and uncover deeper insights than traditional methods of manual or computer assisted analysis. However, while AI tools like NVivo, Atlas.ti, and MAXQDA enhance efficiency by automating coding and theme identification, they are still limited in their ability to replicate the nuanced interpretative role of human researchers. In addition, the adoption of these technologies necessitates careful consideration of ethical implications. Educating public health students on the use and limitations of AI tools, alongside traditional qualitative methods, will prepare them for the evolving research landscape. In this article, we describe current AI-empowered tools for qualitative data analysis, review their strengths and weaknesses, and outline learning objectives with sample lesson plans to prepare public health students to critically employ these tools in their own research endeavors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CommonHealth
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15367/vd6f8w75
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-empowered Qualitative Data Analysis

Ryan McKee, Christopher W. Wheldon
3 citations
CommonHealth
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
12.60
article

AI-empowered Qualitative Data Analysis

Ryan McKee, Christopher W. Wheldon
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) are transforming qualitative data analysis in public health research. By enhancing the efficiency and scalability of data analyses, AI-empowered tools allow researchers to handle larger datasets (i.e. interview transcripts) and uncover deeper insights than traditional methods of manual or computer assisted analysis. However, while AI tools like NVivo, Atlas.ti, and MAXQDA enhance efficiency by automating coding and theme identification, they are still limited in their ability to replicate the nuanced interpretative role of human researchers. In addition, the adoption of these technologies necessitates careful consideration of ethical implications. Educating public health students on the use and limitations of AI tools, alongside traditional qualitative methods, will prepare them for the evolving research landscape. In this article, we describe current AI-empowered tools for qualitative data analysis, review their strengths and weaknesses, and outline learning objectives with sample lesson plans to prepare public health students to critically employ these tools in their own research endeavors.

CommonHealthVol. 6(1)
Temple College (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI-empowered Qualitative Data Analysis — Ryan McKee, Christopher W. Wheldon · CommonHealth (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS