Reflective thinking predicts disbelief in God across 19 countries

In the present study, we tested three hypotheses about relationships between reflective thinking, intuitive thinking (both measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test; CRT), and belief in God or gods (BiG) in university students across 19 culturally and geographically diverse countries (n = 7,771). In support of our first hypothesis, we found a negative relationship between reflective thinking and BiG; and in support of our second hypothesis, we found a positive relationship between intuitive thinking and BiG. Contrary to our third hypothesis, we found no evidence that measuring CRT prior to measuring BiG decreased BiG. Given that this is the first large cross-cultural test of these hypotheses to have a preregistered analysis plan, the first to hold education constant across countries, and the first to use both Bayesian and frequentist methods, these results considerably bolster the evidence in support of the first two hypotheses and against the third hypothesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02691-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflective thinking predicts disbelief in God across 19 countries

Onurcan Yılmaz, Jenny Terry, Robert M. Ross, Ozan İşler et al.
1 citations
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
2.17
article

Reflective thinking predicts disbelief in God across 19 countries

Onurcan Yılmaz, Jenny Terry, Robert M. Ross, Ozan İşler, Omid Ghasemi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the present study, we tested three hypotheses about relationships between reflective thinking, intuitive thinking (both measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test; CRT), and belief in God or gods (BiG) in university students across 19 culturally and geographically diverse countries (n = 7,771). In support of our first hypothesis, we found a negative relationship between reflective thinking and BiG; and in support of our second hypothesis, we found a positive relationship between intuitive thinking and BiG. Contrary to our third hypothesis, we found no evidence that measuring CRT prior to measuring BiG decreased BiG. Given that this is the first large cross-cultural test of these hypotheses to have a preregistered analysis plan, the first to hold education constant across countries, and the first to use both Bayesian and frequentist methods, these results considerably bolster the evidence in support of the first two hypotheses and against the third hypothesis.

Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewVol. 32(5)
Kadir Has University (TR), University of Sussex (GB), The University of Queensland (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
John Templeton Foundation, Macquarie University
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.