"They've Over-Emphasized That One Search": Controlling Unwanted Content on TikTok's For You Page

Modern algorithmic recommendation systems seek to engage users through behavioral content-interest matching. While many platforms recommend content based on engagement metrics, others like TikTok deliver interest-based content, resulting in recommendations perceived to be hyper-personalized compared to other platforms. TikTok's robust recommendation engine has led some users to suspect that the algorithm knows users "better than they know themselves," but this is not always true. In this paper, we explore TikTok users' perceptions of recommended content on their For You Page (FYP), specifically calling attention to unwanted recommendations. Through qualitative interviews of 14 current and former TikTok users, we find themes of frustration with recommended content, attempts to rid themselves of unwanted content, and various degrees of success in eschewing such content. We discuss implications in the larger context of folk theorization and contribute concrete tactical and behavioral examples of algorithmic persistence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713666
Primary Topic
Caching and Content Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"They've Over-Emphasized That One Search": Controlling Unwanted Content on TikTok's For You Page

Julie A. Vera, Sourojit Ghosh
Caching and Content Delivery
article

"They've Over-Emphasized That One Search": Controlling Unwanted Content on TikTok's For You Page

Julie A. Vera, Sourojit Ghosh
article en

Abstract

Modern algorithmic recommendation systems seek to engage users through behavioral content-interest matching. While many platforms recommend content based on engagement metrics, others like TikTok deliver interest-based content, resulting in recommendations perceived to be hyper-personalized compared to other platforms. TikTok's robust recommendation engine has led some users to suspect that the algorithm knows users "better than they know themselves," but this is not always true. In this paper, we explore TikTok users' perceptions of recommended content on their For You Page (FYP), specifically calling attention to unwanted recommendations. Through qualitative interviews of 14 current and former TikTok users, we find themes of frustration with recommended content, attempts to rid themselves of unwanted content, and various degrees of success in eschewing such content. We discuss implications in the larger context of folk theorization and contribute concrete tactical and behavioral examples of algorithmic persistence.

University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Caching and Content Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

"They've Over-Emphasized That One Search": Controlling Unwanted Content on TikTok's For You Page — Julie A. Vera, Sourojit Ghosh · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS