Determination of Subgrade Reaction Modulus Considering the Relative Stiffnesses of Soil–Foundation Systems

The interaction between raft foundations and soils is generally modeled with the help of linear elastic springs. The design of structural elements can only be computed when the modulus of subgrade reaction is accurately determined, which is a time-consuming process for raft foundations with relatively large sizes due to the input of many structural loads. In the present work, an approximate procedure is studied based on the relative stiffnesses of soil–foundation systems suggested by DIN—Technical Report 130. To estimate the behavior of soil–foundation systems (rigid or flexible), the limit values of relative stiffness are first determined for raft foundations on elastic soils with the stiffness moduli obtained from one-dimensional consolidation tests by using finite element analyses. Subsequently, the values of subgrade reaction moduli obtained from the FE analyses are compared and discussed with the subgrade reaction moduli determined by using the analytical method considering the relative stiffnesses of soil–foundation systems. It is shown that for a soil–foundation system with a relative stiffness ≥ 0.174, the subgrade reaction modulus obtained from the analytical method assuming a rigid system is about 1.5 to 2 times higher than that in the FE analyses. For a soil–foundation system with a relative stiffness ≤ 0.0004, the analytical method assuming a flexible system and the FE method yield a similar value of subgrade reaction modulus in the central area of the raft foundation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094714
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of Subgrade Reaction Modulus Considering the Relative Stiffnesses of Soil–Foundation Systems

Sadettin Topçu, Serdar Koltuk
3 citations
Applied Sciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
2.86
article

Determination of Subgrade Reaction Modulus Considering the Relative Stiffnesses of Soil–Foundation Systems

Sadettin Topçu, Serdar Koltuk
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The interaction between raft foundations and soils is generally modeled with the help of linear elastic springs. The design of structural elements can only be computed when the modulus of subgrade reaction is accurately determined, which is a time-consuming process for raft foundations with relatively large sizes due to the input of many structural loads. In the present work, an approximate procedure is studied based on the relative stiffnesses of soil–foundation systems suggested by DIN—Technical Report 130. To estimate the behavior of soil–foundation systems (rigid or flexible), the limit values of relative stiffness are first determined for raft foundations on elastic soils with the stiffness moduli obtained from one-dimensional consolidation tests by using finite element analyses. Subsequently, the values of subgrade reaction moduli obtained from the FE analyses are compared and discussed with the subgrade reaction moduli determined by using the analytical method considering the relative stiffnesses of soil–foundation systems. It is shown that for a soil–foundation system with a relative stiffness ≥ 0.174, the subgrade reaction modulus obtained from the analytical method assuming a rigid system is about 1.5 to 2 times higher than that in the FE analyses. For a soil–foundation system with a relative stiffness ≤ 0.0004, the analytical method assuming a flexible system and the FE method yield a similar value of subgrade reaction modulus in the central area of the raft foundation.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(9)
Jade University of Applied Sciences (DE), Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.