Quantifying the trade-offs between renewable energy visibility and system costs

Visual landscape impacts on scenic and populated places are among significant factors affecting local acceptance of large-scale renewable energy projects. Through the combination of large-scale reverse viewshed and techno-economic energy system analyses, we assess their potential impacts for nationwide energy systems. In our case study of Germany, moderate consideration of visual impact by placing renewables out of sight of the most scenic and densely populated areas does not have a significant impact on future energy system costs and design. In contrast, in scenarios assuming high sensitivity to visual impacts, annual energy system costs would increase by up to 38% in 2045. The energy system's resilience would also be compromised due to the increasing reliance on green hydrogen imports and the uncertain mass adoption of rooftop photovoltaics. Our analytical framework facilitates careful planning that considers the visual impact of renewable energy infrastructure, thus enabling socially acceptable deployment while understanding the implications for system costs and transformation pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59029-1
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
58.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the trade-offs between renewable energy visibility and system costs

Stanley Risch, Detlef Stolten, Felix Kullmann, Ruihong Chen et al.
14 citations
Nature Communications
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
58.82
article

Quantifying the trade-offs between renewable energy visibility and system costs

Stanley Risch, Detlef Stolten, Felix Kullmann, Ruihong Chen, Romanos Ioannidis, Tsamara Tsani, Russell McKenna, Jann Michael Weinand, Tristan Pelser, Rachel Maier
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Visual landscape impacts on scenic and populated places are among significant factors affecting local acceptance of large-scale renewable energy projects. Through the combination of large-scale reverse viewshed and techno-economic energy system analyses, we assess their potential impacts for nationwide energy systems. In our case study of Germany, moderate consideration of visual impact by placing renewables out of sight of the most scenic and densely populated areas does not have a significant impact on future energy system costs and design. In contrast, in scenarios assuming high sensitivity to visual impacts, annual energy system costs would increase by up to 38% in 2045. The energy system's resilience would also be compromised due to the increasing reliance on green hydrogen imports and the uncertain mass adoption of rooftop photovoltaics. Our analytical framework facilitates careful planning that considers the visual impact of renewable energy infrastructure, thus enabling socially acceptable deployment while understanding the implications for system costs and transformation pathways.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), National Technical University of Athens (GR), Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), SystemsX.ch (CH), RWTH Aachen University (DE), Politecnico di Milano (IT), FH Aachen (DE)
European Commission, Bodossaki Foundation, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
58.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.