Sensitivity of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in Deep Gray Matter

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an advanced MRI technique for assessing iron, calcium, and myelin tissue levels based on magnetic susceptibility. QSM consists of multiple processing steps, with various choices for each step. While QSM is increasingly applied in neurodegenerative disease research, its reproducibility and sensitivity in detecting susceptibility changes across groups or over time, which underpin the interpretation of clinical outcomes, have not been thoroughly quantified. This study aimed to evaluate how choices in background field removal (BFR), dipole inversion algorithms, and anatomical referencing impact the detection of changes in deep gray matter susceptibility. We used aging-related changes in brain iron, established in earlier foundational studies, as a surrogate model to test the sensitivity and reproducibility of 378 different QSM pipelines toward the detection of longitudinal susceptibility changes in a clinical setting. We used 10-year follow-up data and scan-rescan data of healthy adults scanned at 3T. Our results demonstrated high variability in the sensitivity of QSM pipelines toward detecting susceptibility changes. While most pipelines detected the same over-time changes, the choice of the BFR algorithm and the referencing strategy influenced reproducibility error and sensitivity substantially. Notably, pipelines using RESHARP with AMP-PE, HEIDI, or LSQR inversion showed the highest overall sensitivity. The findings suggest a strong impact of algorithmic choices in QSM processing on the ability to detect physiological changes in the brain. Careful consideration should be given to the pipeline configuration for reliable clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Brain Mapping
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70187
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in Deep Gray Matter

Jack A. Reeves, Junghun Cho, Gregory E. Wilding, Ferdinand Schweser et al.
6 citations
Human Brain Mapping
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
8.16
article

Sensitivity of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Clinical Research in Deep Gray Matter

Jack A. Reeves, Junghun Cho, Gregory E. Wilding, Ferdinand Schweser, Michael G. Dwyer, Dejan Jakimovski, Niels Bergsland, Thomas Jochmann, Fahad Salman, Robert Zivadinov, Ademola Adegbemigun, Mirjam Prayer, Abhisri Ramesh
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is an advanced MRI technique for assessing iron, calcium, and myelin tissue levels based on magnetic susceptibility. QSM consists of multiple processing steps, with various choices for each step. While QSM is increasingly applied in neurodegenerative disease research, its reproducibility and sensitivity in detecting susceptibility changes across groups or over time, which underpin the interpretation of clinical outcomes, have not been thoroughly quantified. This study aimed to evaluate how choices in background field removal (BFR), dipole inversion algorithms, and anatomical referencing impact the detection of changes in deep gray matter susceptibility. We used aging-related changes in brain iron, established in earlier foundational studies, as a surrogate model to test the sensitivity and reproducibility of 378 different QSM pipelines toward the detection of longitudinal susceptibility changes in a clinical setting. We used 10-year follow-up data and scan-rescan data of healthy adults scanned at 3T. Our results demonstrated high variability in the sensitivity of QSM pipelines toward detecting susceptibility changes. While most pipelines detected the same over-time changes, the choice of the BFR algorithm and the referencing strategy influenced reproducibility error and sensitivity substantially. Notably, pipelines using RESHARP with AMP-PE, HEIDI, or LSQR inversion showed the highest overall sensitivity. The findings suggest a strong impact of algorithmic choices in QSM processing on the ability to detect physiological changes in the brain. Careful consideration should be given to the pipeline configuration for reliable clinical outcomes.

Human Brain MappingVol. 46(6)
Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Science Foundation, Emory University, European Commission, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Seoul National University, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, National Institutes of Health, University at Buffalo, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
8.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.