Quantifying Added Drag in Swimming With Parachutes: Implications for Resisted Swimming Training

Coloretti, V, Fantozzi, S, Gatta, G, Bonifazi, M, Zamparo, P, and Cortesi, M. Quantifying added drag in swimming with parachutes: implications for resisted swimming training. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): e701-e705, 2025-Swimming parachutes are often used during training as resistive equipment, but their added load and the hydrodynamic effects of the swimmer in front have yet to be investigated. This study explores the drag coefficient (k) of 4 commercial parachutes with different sizes under 3 conditions: (a) when towed without a swimmer in front (kpara), (b) pulled by a passive (streamlined) swimmer (kPpara), and (c) pulled by an actively propelling swimmer (kApara). An electromechanical device was used to assess kpara and kPpara as the ratio between towing force and the square of towing velocity during 5 trials at different velocities while kApara was measured based on full-tethered and semi-tethered forces using the residual thrust methods. The values of kpara were as follows: 15.4 ± 0.1, 19.7 ± 0.1, 37.2 ± 0.1, and 73.9 ± 2.8 N·s2·m-2 for parachutes with surfaces of 400, 529, 900, and 1,600 cm2, respectively. Parachute resistance decreased by approximately 21% when pulled by a passive swimmer, whereas it increased by about 15% when pulled by a propelling swimmer. Possible explanations for these differences include drafting and added mass effects. Data reported in this study can assist coaches in quantifying the added load of swimming parachutes during training, by knowing only the parachute size and the swimming velocity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005109
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Added Drag in Swimming With Parachutes: Implications for Resisted Swimming Training

Matteo Cortesi, Silvia Fantozzi, Marco Bonifazi, Giorgio Gatta et al.
2 citations
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
article

Quantifying Added Drag in Swimming With Parachutes: Implications for Resisted Swimming Training

Matteo Cortesi, Silvia Fantozzi, Marco Bonifazi, Giorgio Gatta, Vittorio Coloretti, Paola Zamparo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Coloretti, V, Fantozzi, S, Gatta, G, Bonifazi, M, Zamparo, P, and Cortesi, M. Quantifying added drag in swimming with parachutes: implications for resisted swimming training. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): e701-e705, 2025-Swimming parachutes are often used during training as resistive equipment, but their added load and the hydrodynamic effects of the swimmer in front have yet to be investigated. This study explores the drag coefficient (k) of 4 commercial parachutes with different sizes under 3 conditions: (a) when towed without a swimmer in front (kpara), (b) pulled by a passive (streamlined) swimmer (kPpara), and (c) pulled by an actively propelling swimmer (kApara). An electromechanical device was used to assess kpara and kPpara as the ratio between towing force and the square of towing velocity during 5 trials at different velocities while kApara was measured based on full-tethered and semi-tethered forces using the residual thrust methods. The values of kpara were as follows: 15.4 ± 0.1, 19.7 ± 0.1, 37.2 ± 0.1, and 73.9 ± 2.8 N·s2·m-2 for parachutes with surfaces of 400, 529, 900, and 1,600 cm2, respectively. Parachute resistance decreased by approximately 21% when pulled by a passive swimmer, whereas it increased by about 15% when pulled by a propelling swimmer. Possible explanations for these differences include drafting and added mass effects. Data reported in this study can assist coaches in quantifying the added load of swimming parachutes during training, by knowing only the parachute size and the swimming velocity.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 39(5)
University of Siena (IT), University of Verona (IT), Laboratori Guglielmo Marconi (Italy) (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.