Test–retest reliability of visual and self-motion cue combination during navigation: accuracy, variability, and cue weighting

Multisensory cue combination during navigation is examined for the relative use and integration of different sensory spatial cues, but the reliability of cue combination metrics has not yet been characterized. We quantify the test-retest reliability of three metrics (accuracy, variability, predicted cue-weighting) used in studies of sensory cue combination for spatial updating. Participants completed a triangular homing task in immersive virtual reality comprising three cue conditions - visual cues-only, self-motion cues-only, and visual + self-motion cues - in two sessions separated by an average 11-day interval. We found strong test-retest reliability of homing accuracy with two sensory cues but poor reliability of accuracy when only one sensory cue was available. Homing variability and predicted cue-weighting showed poor test-retest reliability across all conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spatial Cognition and Computation
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2025.2492553
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test–retest reliability of visual and self-motion cue combination during navigation: accuracy, variability, and cue weighting

Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Hunter Finney, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, Maggie K. McCracken et al.
1 citations
Spatial Cognition and Computation
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
article

Test–retest reliability of visual and self-motion cue combination during navigation: accuracy, variability, and cue weighting

Sarah H. Creem-Regehr, Hunter Finney, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, Maggie K. McCracken, Paul Hines, Corey S. Shayman, Jonathan L. Koff
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Multisensory cue combination during navigation is examined for the relative use and integration of different sensory spatial cues, but the reliability of cue combination metrics has not yet been characterized. We quantify the test-retest reliability of three metrics (accuracy, variability, predicted cue-weighting) used in studies of sensory cue combination for spatial updating. Participants completed a triangular homing task in immersive virtual reality comprising three cue conditions - visual cues-only, self-motion cues-only, and visual + self-motion cues - in two sessions separated by an average 11-day interval. We found strong test-retest reliability of homing accuracy with two sensory cues but poor reliability of accuracy when only one sensory cue was available. Homing variability and predicted cue-weighting showed poor test-retest reliability across all conditions.

Spatial Cognition and ComputationVol. 25(4)
University of Utah (US)
American Otological Society, University of Utah, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.