Visual formats in risk preference elicitation: What catches the eye?

Abstract We explore the effect of lottery presentation formats on elicitation of risk preferences using a popular probability varying task (Holt & Laury. The American Economic Review 92 (5), 1644–1655. 2002) and a payoff-varying task (Drichoutis & Lusk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 53 (2), 89–106. 2016). The presentation formats use horizontal bars that vary either the width or height of the bars (or both at the same time) to help subjects in judging how large or small probabilities and monetary amounts are in a given choice set. These graphical formats are compared to a text only format. We complement our choice data with eye tracking data that enriches our structural models with additional information regarding how visual attention varies with the presented information. While we find no statistically significant effects of presentation formats on elicited parameters for risk preferences, we find that eye tracking information not only is associated with preference parameters, but it also changes the inferences with respect to which decision theory better fits the choice data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-025-09455-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual formats in risk preference elicitation: What catches the eye?

Marco A. Palma, Michelle S. Segovia, Jayson L. Lusk, Andreas C. Drichoutis
2 citations
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
4.54
article

Visual formats in risk preference elicitation: What catches the eye?

Marco A. Palma, Michelle S. Segovia, Jayson L. Lusk, Andreas C. Drichoutis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We explore the effect of lottery presentation formats on elicitation of risk preferences using a popular probability varying task (Holt & Laury. The American Economic Review 92 (5), 1644–1655. 2002) and a payoff-varying task (Drichoutis & Lusk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 53 (2), 89–106. 2016). The presentation formats use horizontal bars that vary either the width or height of the bars (or both at the same time) to help subjects in judging how large or small probabilities and monetary amounts are in a given choice set. These graphical formats are compared to a text only format. We complement our choice data with eye tracking data that enriches our structural models with additional information regarding how visual attention varies with the presented information. While we find no statistically significant effects of presentation formats on elicited parameters for risk preferences, we find that eye tracking information not only is associated with preference parameters, but it also changes the inferences with respect to which decision theory better fits the choice data.

Journal of Risk and UncertaintyVol. 70(3)
Agricultural University of Athens (GR), Oklahoma State University (US), University of Delaware (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Hellenic Academic Libraries Link, Agricultural University of Athens
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
4.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Visual formats in risk preference elicitation: What catches the eye? — Marco A. Palma, Michelle S. Segovia, et al. · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS