China’s Red Sea gambit: a paradigm shift of NSAGs and the Maritime strategic dilemma in the Middle East

The surge in attacks by non-state armed groups (NSAGs) like the Houthis in Yemen following the 7 October 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas has created a complex situation for China in the Red Sea region. These actions have put oil shipments at risk and threatened the stability of important maritime routes that are strategic chokepoints in the region. This research analyzes the increase of NSAGs in the Middle East from a neorealist perspective, with a focus on the strategic response of China as a rising power. China, heavily reliant on Middle Eastern oil, aims to protect its Maritime Silk Road (MSR) and advance its economic and geopolitical interests in the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean regions by securing sea lines of communication (SLOCs). Ultimately, significant questions remain: What are the regional and global implications of NSAGs disrupting international passages and strategic maritime choke points? Can China, Arab nations, and the GCC achieve collective security in the Red Sea region to safeguard the MSR? Combining a qualitative analysis of China’s geopolitical role in the Middle East with a quantitative examination of its economic relationships reveals new insights into how these factors shape regional security dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Arts and Humanities
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2495475
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maritime Security and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s Red Sea gambit: a paradigm shift of NSAGs and the Maritime strategic dilemma in the Middle East

Ronen A. Cohen, Riya Sultana
1 citations
Cogent Arts and Humanities
Maritime Security and History
2.18
article

China’s Red Sea gambit: a paradigm shift of NSAGs and the Maritime strategic dilemma in the Middle East

Ronen A. Cohen, Riya Sultana
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The surge in attacks by non-state armed groups (NSAGs) like the Houthis in Yemen following the 7 October 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas has created a complex situation for China in the Red Sea region. These actions have put oil shipments at risk and threatened the stability of important maritime routes that are strategic chokepoints in the region. This research analyzes the increase of NSAGs in the Middle East from a neorealist perspective, with a focus on the strategic response of China as a rising power. China, heavily reliant on Middle Eastern oil, aims to protect its Maritime Silk Road (MSR) and advance its economic and geopolitical interests in the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean regions by securing sea lines of communication (SLOCs). Ultimately, significant questions remain: What are the regional and global implications of NSAGs disrupting international passages and strategic maritime choke points? Can China, Arab nations, and the GCC achieve collective security in the Red Sea region to safeguard the MSR? Combining a qualitative analysis of China’s geopolitical role in the Middle East with a quantitative examination of its economic relationships reveals new insights into how these factors shape regional security dynamics.

Cogent Arts and HumanitiesVol. 12(1)
Ariel University (IL)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Maritime Security and History
2.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China’s Red Sea gambit: a paradigm shift of NSAGs and the Maritime strategic dilemma in the Middle East — Ronen A. Cohen, Riya Sultana · Cogent Arts and Humanities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS