Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Ionic and Non‐Ionic Surfactants by Streaming Potential Measurements

A capillary electrophoresis system capable of measuring streaming potentials was used for the determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and non-ionic surfactants. The CMC values of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), zwitterionic surfactant 3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) and non-ionic surfactant polyethylene glycol p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl ether (Triton X-100) in water or salt solutions were determined by determining the abrupt change in the trend of streaming potential change with the surfactant concentration. The CMC values were 8.23, 0.93, 5.80 and 0.16 mM, respectively. This method was also used to demonstrate how the CMCs of SDS and CTAB change differently with temperature. The CMC of SDS decreased from 10°C to 25°C and then increased from 25°C to 40°C, whereas CTAB only increased linearly within 10°C-40°C. The capillary wall zeta potentials in surfactant solutions can be calculated from the measured streaming potential, conductivity and solution viscosity. Surface charge densities were calculated using the zeta potentials obtained. The surface charge densities of SDS were calculated to be 5.6-0.8 C/m<sup>2</sup> when SDS solutions with concentrations of 2-20 mM zeta potentials were used. The calculated zeta potentials and surface charge densities reached a plateau at about 8 mM, which coincided with the CMC of SDS determined in the present study and the literature values. The CMC values obtained from streaming potential measurement are comparable to values obtained with other CMC determination techniques such as surface tension and conductometric measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electrophoresis
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8145
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Ionic and Non‐Ionic Surfactants by Streaming Potential Measurements

David D. Y. Chen, Yuri Chenyakin
7 citations
Electrophoresis
Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
6.55
article

Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Ionic and Non‐Ionic Surfactants by Streaming Potential Measurements

David D. Y. Chen, Yuri Chenyakin
article en
7 citations

Abstract

A capillary electrophoresis system capable of measuring streaming potentials was used for the determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and non-ionic surfactants. The CMC values of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), zwitterionic surfactant 3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) and non-ionic surfactant polyethylene glycol p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl ether (Triton X-100) in water or salt solutions were determined by determining the abrupt change in the trend of streaming potential change with the surfactant concentration. The CMC values were 8.23, 0.93, 5.80 and 0.16 mM, respectively. This method was also used to demonstrate how the CMCs of SDS and CTAB change differently with temperature. The CMC of SDS decreased from 10°C to 25°C and then increased from 25°C to 40°C, whereas CTAB only increased linearly within 10°C-40°C. The capillary wall zeta potentials in surfactant solutions can be calculated from the measured streaming potential, conductivity and solution viscosity. Surface charge densities were calculated using the zeta potentials obtained. The surface charge densities of SDS were calculated to be 5.6-0.8 C/m<sup>2</sup> when SDS solutions with concentrations of 2-20 mM zeta potentials were used. The calculated zeta potentials and surface charge densities reached a plateau at about 8 mM, which coincided with the CMC of SDS determined in the present study and the literature values. The CMC values obtained from streaming potential measurement are comparable to values obtained with other CMC determination techniques such as surface tension and conductometric measurements.

ElectrophoresisVol. 46(13-14)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
6.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.