Integrating Top‐Down Energetic Constraints With Bottom‐Up Process‐Based Constraints for More Accurate Projections of Future Warming

Abstract The quantification of aerosol‐induced radiative forcing and cloud feedbacks remains a significant challenge in climate modeling, primarily due to the complex interplay of aerosol and clouds in a warming world. Traditional approaches often rely on either bottom‐up process‐based models, difficult to constrain against present‐day observations, or top‐down methods that lack the ability to capture the underlying processes accurately. Here, we present an approach that combines both bottom‐up process‐based constraints and top‐down energetic constraints of aerosol forcing and cloud feedbacks simultaneously to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of aerosol impacts on clouds and the climate. Applying the new method to the Community Atmosphere Model v6, we infer narrower parameter ranges for key process parameters, a reduced effective radiative forcing of −1.08 [−1.29–−0.77] Wm −2 , and hence 66% more precise future projections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl114269
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Top‐Down Energetic Constraints With Bottom‐Up Process‐Based Constraints for More Accurate Projections of Future Warming

Duncan Watson‐Parris
1 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Climate variability and models
1.11
article

Integrating Top‐Down Energetic Constraints With Bottom‐Up Process‐Based Constraints for More Accurate Projections of Future Warming

Duncan Watson‐Parris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The quantification of aerosol‐induced radiative forcing and cloud feedbacks remains a significant challenge in climate modeling, primarily due to the complex interplay of aerosol and clouds in a warming world. Traditional approaches often rely on either bottom‐up process‐based models, difficult to constrain against present‐day observations, or top‐down methods that lack the ability to capture the underlying processes accurately. Here, we present an approach that combines both bottom‐up process‐based constraints and top‐down energetic constraints of aerosol forcing and cloud feedbacks simultaneously to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of aerosol impacts on clouds and the climate. Applying the new method to the Community Atmosphere Model v6, we infer narrower parameter ranges for key process parameters, a reduced effective radiative forcing of −1.08 [−1.29–−0.77] Wm −2 , and hence 66% more precise future projections.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(8)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), University of California San Diego (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Climate variability and models
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.