Constraints on dark matter with future MeV gamma-ray telescopes

A number of new balloon or space-based <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>γ</a:mi></a:math>-ray observatories have been proposed to close a “MeV gap” in sensitivity to <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>γ</c:mi></c:math> rays in the MeV–GeV energy band. One aspect of the science case for these instruments is their ability to constrain or discover decaying or annihilating dark matter. In this work, we forecast the sensitivity of these instruments for dark matter annihilation or decay for a range of possible Standard Model final states and compare to existing bounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.083037
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraints on dark matter with future MeV gamma-ray telescopes

Tracy R. Slatyer, Kayla E. O’Donnell
10 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
18.70
article

Constraints on dark matter with future MeV gamma-ray telescopes

Tracy R. Slatyer, Kayla E. O’Donnell
article en
10 citations

Abstract

A number of new balloon or space-based <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>γ</a:mi></a:math>-ray observatories have been proposed to close a “MeV gap” in sensitivity to <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>γ</c:mi></c:math> rays in the MeV–GeV energy band. One aspect of the science case for these instruments is their ability to constrain or discover decaying or annihilating dark matter. In this work, we forecast the sensitivity of these instruments for dark matter annihilation or decay for a range of possible Standard Model final states and compare to existing bounds.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(8)
Harvard University Press (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Simons Foundation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Aspen Center for Physics, Office of Science, Department of Physics, Harvard University, Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, High Energy Physics
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
18.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.