Testing the Applicability of Drone-Based Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeological Prospection

Ground-based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been applied successfully for decades in archaeological geophysics. However, there are sometimes severe problems arising in cases of rough terrain, permission to enter a site, or due to vegetation. Other issues may also make it impossible to use conventional ground-based GPR. Therefore, mounting the GPR antenna below a drone could be a potential alternative. Successful applications of drone-based GPR have already been reported, e.g., in the fields of geological mapping, glaciology, and UXO-detection. However, it is not clear whether faint archaeological remains can also be mapped using this approach. In the survey discussed below, we tested such a drone-based GPR setup at an archaeological site in Bavaria, where well-preserved Roman foundations at a shallow depth are known from previous geophysical surveys with magnetics and ground-based GPR. The aim was to evaluate the possibilities and problems arising with this new approach through a comparison with the afore-mentioned data, obtained in previous ground-based surveys of this site. The results show that under certain circumstances, the archaeological remains can be resolved while using a drone. However, the remains are much harder to detect with a lower degree of resolution and survey setup and acquisition time play a crucial role for a successful survey. Especially relevant are two factors: First, the correct choice of profile orientation, as there are strong reflections caused by near-surface features (like field boundaries) due to decoupling the antenna from the ground. Second, a very dry soil is mandatory, as otherwise too much signal is lost at the air-ground-interface. Considering these factors, drone-based GPR represents a valuable tool for modern archaeological geophysics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091498
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Archaeological Research and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the Applicability of Drone-Based Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeological Prospection

Roland Linck, Andreas Stele, Manish P. Kale, Joachim Schlechtriem
4 citations
Remote Sensing
Archaeological Research and Protection
29.83
article

Testing the Applicability of Drone-Based Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeological Prospection

Roland Linck, Andreas Stele, Manish P. Kale, Joachim Schlechtriem
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Ground-based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been applied successfully for decades in archaeological geophysics. However, there are sometimes severe problems arising in cases of rough terrain, permission to enter a site, or due to vegetation. Other issues may also make it impossible to use conventional ground-based GPR. Therefore, mounting the GPR antenna below a drone could be a potential alternative. Successful applications of drone-based GPR have already been reported, e.g., in the fields of geological mapping, glaciology, and UXO-detection. However, it is not clear whether faint archaeological remains can also be mapped using this approach. In the survey discussed below, we tested such a drone-based GPR setup at an archaeological site in Bavaria, where well-preserved Roman foundations at a shallow depth are known from previous geophysical surveys with magnetics and ground-based GPR. The aim was to evaluate the possibilities and problems arising with this new approach through a comparison with the afore-mentioned data, obtained in previous ground-based surveys of this site. The results show that under certain circumstances, the archaeological remains can be resolved while using a drone. However, the remains are much harder to detect with a lower degree of resolution and survey setup and acquisition time play a crucial role for a successful survey. Especially relevant are two factors: First, the correct choice of profile orientation, as there are strong reflections caused by near-surface features (like field boundaries) due to decoupling the antenna from the ground. Second, a very dry soil is mandatory, as otherwise too much signal is lost at the air-ground-interface. Considering these factors, drone-based GPR represents a valuable tool for modern archaeological geophysics.

Remote SensingVol. 17(9)
Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Archaeological Research and Protection
29.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.