Disparities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Among Sexual Minority Women in Japan: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

<b>Objectives</b>: While health disparities affecting sexual minority women are well-documented globally, little is known about cancer screening behaviors among sexual minority women in Japan. Following our previous study on breast cancer screening, this study examined cervical cancer screening participation patterns and compared screening behaviors between both cancer types among sexual minority women in Japan. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed data from 13,730 individuals with female sex assigned at birth who participated in a nationwide online survey between September and November 2023. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with screening participation, comparing sexual minority women (n = 2685) and women who are not part of a sexual minority (n = 11,045). Among participants aged 40 and above (n = 8933), we compared participation patterns between cervical and breast cancer screenings. <b>Results</b>: Sexual minority women showed significantly lower cervical cancer screening rates compared to women who are not part of a sexual minority (38.7% vs. 45.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with a wider disparity than observed in breast cancer screening (43.4% vs. 45.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among those aged 40 and above, sexual minority women were more likely to skip both screenings (35.0% vs. 27.2%) and less likely to participate in both (55.0% vs. 62.6%). Additionally, our analysis revealed that participants with a current mental disorder (i.e., those reporting ongoing mental health issues) were more likely to intend to undergo cervical cancer screening (aOR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.15-1.67, <i>p</i> = 0.001). In contrast, among bisexual participants and those classified as having "other" mental health conditions-defined as a history of mental health issues without current symptoms-exhibited significantly lower odds of being screened (aOR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.11-0.82, <i>p</i> = 0.02). <b>Conclusions</b>: Significant disparities exist in cancer screening participation among sexual minority women in Japan, with more pronounced differences in cervical cancer screening compared to breast cancer screening. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions addressing the unique barriers to gynecological care among sexual minority women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091411
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Among Sexual Minority Women in Japan: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Akihiko Ozaki, Takahiro Tabuchi, Michio Murakami, Tohru Ohtake et al.
Cancers
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Disparities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Among Sexual Minority Women in Japan: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Akihiko Ozaki, Takahiro Tabuchi, Michio Murakami, Tohru Ohtake, Hiroaki Saito, Mika Nashimoto, Daisuke Hori, Masaharu Tsubokura, Kenji Gonda, Masahiro Wada, A Hara, Kazunoshin Tachibana
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: While health disparities affecting sexual minority women are well-documented globally, little is known about cancer screening behaviors among sexual minority women in Japan. Following our previous study on breast cancer screening, this study examined cervical cancer screening participation patterns and compared screening behaviors between both cancer types among sexual minority women in Japan. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed data from 13,730 individuals with female sex assigned at birth who participated in a nationwide online survey between September and November 2023. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with screening participation, comparing sexual minority women (n = 2685) and women who are not part of a sexual minority (n = 11,045). Among participants aged 40 and above (n = 8933), we compared participation patterns between cervical and breast cancer screenings. <b>Results</b>: Sexual minority women showed significantly lower cervical cancer screening rates compared to women who are not part of a sexual minority (38.7% vs. 45.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with a wider disparity than observed in breast cancer screening (43.4% vs. 45.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among those aged 40 and above, sexual minority women were more likely to skip both screenings (35.0% vs. 27.2%) and less likely to participate in both (55.0% vs. 62.6%). Additionally, our analysis revealed that participants with a current mental disorder (i.e., those reporting ongoing mental health issues) were more likely to intend to undergo cervical cancer screening (aOR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.15-1.67, <i>p</i> = 0.001). In contrast, among bisexual participants and those classified as having "other" mental health conditions-defined as a history of mental health issues without current symptoms-exhibited significantly lower odds of being screened (aOR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.11-0.82, <i>p</i> = 0.02). <b>Conclusions</b>: Significant disparities exist in cancer screening participation among sexual minority women in Japan, with more pronounced differences in cervical cancer screening compared to breast cancer screening. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions addressing the unique barriers to gynecological care among sexual minority women.

CancersVol. 17(9)
Fukushima Medical University (JP), University of Tsukuba (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation (JP), Kameda Medical Center (JP), Saiseikai Utsunomiya hospital (JP), Medical Governance Research Institute (JP), Soma Central Hospital (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.