Benchmarking Controllers for Low-Cost Agricultural SCARA Manipulators

Agriculture needs to produce more with fewer resources to satisfy the world's demands. Labor shortages, especially during harvest seasons, emphasize the need for agricultural automation. However, the high cost of commercially available robotic manipulators, ranging from EUR 3000 to EUR 500,000, is a significant barrier. This research addresses the challenges posed by low-cost manipulators, such as inaccuracy, limited sensor feedback, and dynamic uncertainties. Three control strategies for a low-cost agricultural SCARA manipulator were developed and benchmarked: a Sliding Mode Controller (SMC), a Reinforcement Learning (RL) Controller, and a novel Proportional-Integral (PI) controller with a self-tuning feedforward element (PIFF). The results show the best response time was obtained using the SMC, but with joint movement jitter. The RL controller showed sudden breaks and overshot upon reaching the setpoint. Finally, the PIFF controller showed the smoothest reference tracking but was more susceptible to changes in system dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25092676
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Controllers for Low-Cost Agricultural SCARA Manipulators

Manuel F. Silva, Vítor Tinoco, Filipe Neves dos Santos, Raul Morais
Sensors
Smart Agriculture and AI
article

Benchmarking Controllers for Low-Cost Agricultural SCARA Manipulators

Manuel F. Silva, Vítor Tinoco, Filipe Neves dos Santos, Raul Morais
article en

Abstract

Agriculture needs to produce more with fewer resources to satisfy the world's demands. Labor shortages, especially during harvest seasons, emphasize the need for agricultural automation. However, the high cost of commercially available robotic manipulators, ranging from EUR 3000 to EUR 500,000, is a significant barrier. This research addresses the challenges posed by low-cost manipulators, such as inaccuracy, limited sensor feedback, and dynamic uncertainties. Three control strategies for a low-cost agricultural SCARA manipulator were developed and benchmarked: a Sliding Mode Controller (SMC), a Reinforcement Learning (RL) Controller, and a novel Proportional-Integral (PI) controller with a self-tuning feedforward element (PIFF). The results show the best response time was obtained using the SMC, but with joint movement jitter. The RL controller showed sudden breaks and overshot upon reaching the setpoint. Finally, the PIFF controller showed the smoothest reference tracking but was more susceptible to changes in system dynamics.

SensorsVol. 25(9)
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT), INESC TEC (PT), Polytechnic Institute of Porto (PT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Smart Agriculture and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Benchmarking Controllers for Low-Cost Agricultural SCARA Manipulators — Manuel F. Silva, Vítor Tinoco, et al. · Sensors (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS