Queering Ervah: Halachic Conceptions of Gender-Based Nakedness for the Modern World

This paper examines rabbinic conceptions of ervah—the halachic category for nakedness—and explores their application to modern, egalitarian, queer, and gender-queer contexts. Ervah is defined through two basic paradigms: (1) the objective paradigm, where genitalia universally defines ervah regardless of gender or cultural norms, and (2) the subjective paradigm, where gender and cultural norms greatly influence the relegation of body attributes to this category. Drawing upon tannaitic, medieval, and modern halachic sources, the paper evaluates traditional positions on ervah using three paradigms of gender definition: (1) genotype, (2) genitalia, and (3) phenotype, considering each paradigm’s impact upon transgender and intersex individuals. Further, it considers two primary interpretive approaches: (1) gender-inflexible, which assumes an all-encompassing heteronormative, cisgender framework, and (2) gender-expansive, which prioritizes the individual viewers’ sexual orientation and agency over assumed norms. Ultimately, the paper argues for a more fluid, gender-expansive approach to defining halachic ervah.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iggrot Ha Ari
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52214/iha.v4i1.13735
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Queering Ervah: Halachic Conceptions of Gender-Based Nakedness for the Modern World

Charlie Feuerman
Iggrot Ha Ari
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

Queering Ervah: Halachic Conceptions of Gender-Based Nakedness for the Modern World

Charlie Feuerman
article en

Abstract

This paper examines rabbinic conceptions of ervah—the halachic category for nakedness—and explores their application to modern, egalitarian, queer, and gender-queer contexts. Ervah is defined through two basic paradigms: (1) the objective paradigm, where genitalia universally defines ervah regardless of gender or cultural norms, and (2) the subjective paradigm, where gender and cultural norms greatly influence the relegation of body attributes to this category. Drawing upon tannaitic, medieval, and modern halachic sources, the paper evaluates traditional positions on ervah using three paradigms of gender definition: (1) genotype, (2) genitalia, and (3) phenotype, considering each paradigm’s impact upon transgender and intersex individuals. Further, it considers two primary interpretive approaches: (1) gender-inflexible, which assumes an all-encompassing heteronormative, cisgender framework, and (2) gender-expansive, which prioritizes the individual viewers’ sexual orientation and agency over assumed norms. Ultimately, the paper argues for a more fluid, gender-expansive approach to defining halachic ervah.

Iggrot Ha AriVol. 4
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Queering Ervah: Halachic Conceptions of Gender-Based Nakedness for the Modern World — Charlie Feuerman · Iggrot Ha Ari (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS