Heuristic Selection in Disaster Recovery Sequencing

Transportation network recovery after an extreme hazard or natural disaster is time sensitive and resource intensive, with hundreds or thousands of damaged links needing repair. The associated optimization problem is difficult, and experiments in the published literature are largely confined to smaller-scale instances. We aim to bridge this gap by comparing eight algorithms proposed for repair sequencing on larger-scale instances. These methods include algorithms proposed in prior literature, an improved bidirectional beam search heuristic, and a simulated annealing heuristic newly tailored for network repair sequencing. Our experiments involved over 1,900 random problem instances over two test networks with 8–64 broken links, significantly greater than what has been reported in past literature. We assessed the solution quality and computational needs of these methods. In particular, our simulated annealing heuristic offers high-quality solutions in less than a day for problems with up to 175 and 185 broken links on the Anaheim and Berlin-Mitte-Center test networks, respectively, corresponding to 18%–20% of network links. We also show transferability of the simulated annealing heuristic by tuning its parameters on the Anaheim network, then applying it without further tuning to Berlin-Mitte-Center. Comparable performance was obtained on both networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jitse4.iseng-2467
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heuristic Selection in Disaster Recovery Sequencing

Stephen D. Boyles, A.J. Crocker
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

Heuristic Selection in Disaster Recovery Sequencing

Stephen D. Boyles, A.J. Crocker
article en

Abstract

Transportation network recovery after an extreme hazard or natural disaster is time sensitive and resource intensive, with hundreds or thousands of damaged links needing repair. The associated optimization problem is difficult, and experiments in the published literature are largely confined to smaller-scale instances. We aim to bridge this gap by comparing eight algorithms proposed for repair sequencing on larger-scale instances. These methods include algorithms proposed in prior literature, an improved bidirectional beam search heuristic, and a simulated annealing heuristic newly tailored for network repair sequencing. Our experiments involved over 1,900 random problem instances over two test networks with 8–64 broken links, significantly greater than what has been reported in past literature. We assessed the solution quality and computational needs of these methods. In particular, our simulated annealing heuristic offers high-quality solutions in less than a day for problems with up to 175 and 185 broken links on the Anaheim and Berlin-Mitte-Center test networks, respectively, corresponding to 18%–20% of network links. We also show transferability of the simulated annealing heuristic by tuning its parameters on the Anaheim network, then applying it without further tuning to Berlin-Mitte-Center. Comparable performance was obtained on both networks.

Journal of Infrastructure SystemsVol. 31(3)
United States Military Academy (US), American Military Academy (PR), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.