An Observation-Based Evaluation of the Initiation and Ideation Phases of a Business Model Innovation Process

This paper explores the initiation and ideation phases of the business model innovation (BMI) process, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the need for BMI and preparing accordingly. Using unstructured participant observation, the study reveals disparities between two case companies and proposes a generic BMI process model. The case companies are both incumbent, successful, globally operating, and family-owned production companies. This model outlines process steps, methods, key discussion points, and ideal outcomes, supported by flowcharts and tables. Additionally, it highlights common pitfalls to avoid. The investigation identifies disparities between the two case companies and weaknesses of the current established BMI process. Eventually, the findings offer valuable insights into improving BMI practices, stressing the need for empirical research and structured approaches for successful innovation adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219877025500117
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital Innovation in Industries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Observation-Based Evaluation of the Initiation and Ideation Phases of a Business Model Innovation Process

Nadine Bachmann, Herbert Jodlbauer, Manuel Brunner, Katherine Gundolf et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management
Digital Innovation in Industries
5.52
article

An Observation-Based Evaluation of the Initiation and Ideation Phases of a Business Model Innovation Process

Nadine Bachmann, Herbert Jodlbauer, Manuel Brunner, Katherine Gundolf, Sebastian Pöchtrager, Alican Tüzün
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the initiation and ideation phases of the business model innovation (BMI) process, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the need for BMI and preparing accordingly. Using unstructured participant observation, the study reveals disparities between two case companies and proposes a generic BMI process model. The case companies are both incumbent, successful, globally operating, and family-owned production companies. This model outlines process steps, methods, key discussion points, and ideal outcomes, supported by flowcharts and tables. Additionally, it highlights common pitfalls to avoid. The investigation identifies disparities between the two case companies and weaknesses of the current established BMI process. Eventually, the findings offer valuable insights into improving BMI practices, stressing the need for empirical research and structured approaches for successful innovation adoption.

International Journal of Innovation and Technology ManagementVol. 22(03n04)
Aix-Marseille Université (FR), University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria (AT), University of Twente (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Innovation in Industries
5.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.