The reintroduction of Apennine chamois in the Majella National Park: An evaluation of long-term results

• Reintroductions are key in wildlife management and conservation efforts. • The goal is a self-sustaining population with no further human intervention. • We report the first-ever reintroduction of the Apennine chamois in Majella. • The population has exceeded 1300 individuals after 22–25 years. • Large mixed groups, up to 200, are now common in Majella National Park (Italy). Reintroductions are a fundamental tool in wildlife management and conservation. Monitoring and reporting are crucial for establishing protocols for threatened species. Here we report the full translocation process of the very first reintroduction of the Apennine chamois ( Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata ) ever made that took place in Majella National Park (Central Apennines, Italy) with the release of 22 females and 18 males in 1991–2006 period. We described the pre and post release methodologies, the population and distribution dynamics, and the present status and structure of the population. Through systematic monitoring, we assessed the increase in distribution range (from 7.9 km 2 in 2000 up to 23.9 km 2 in 2022 for females with kids). Considering a time span of 25 years, the population now exceeds 1300 individuals and still shows a growing trend. Quite large mixed groups (up to > 200 individuals) are frequently seen while the largest male-only group ever seen thus far numbered 71 individuals. Overall sex ratio MM:FF reached 1.1, while the birth rate decreased from 0.70 to 0.80 in early 2010′s to 0.35–0.55 in 2021–2022, showing a potential density dependence effect and highlighting the importance of long-term monitoring to identify potential limiting factors to habitat suitability or carrying capacity of reintroduced populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Nature Conservation
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126950
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The reintroduction of Apennine chamois in the Majella National Park: An evaluation of long-term results

Simone Angelucci, Marco Apollonio, Roberta Chirichella, Antonio Antonucci et al.
Journal for Nature Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

The reintroduction of Apennine chamois in the Majella National Park: An evaluation of long-term results

Simone Angelucci, Marco Apollonio, Roberta Chirichella, Antonio Antonucci, Alessandro Asprea, Di Domenico G
article en

Abstract

• Reintroductions are key in wildlife management and conservation efforts. • The goal is a self-sustaining population with no further human intervention. • We report the first-ever reintroduction of the Apennine chamois in Majella. • The population has exceeded 1300 individuals after 22–25 years. • Large mixed groups, up to 200, are now common in Majella National Park (Italy). Reintroductions are a fundamental tool in wildlife management and conservation. Monitoring and reporting are crucial for establishing protocols for threatened species. Here we report the full translocation process of the very first reintroduction of the Apennine chamois ( Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata ) ever made that took place in Majella National Park (Central Apennines, Italy) with the release of 22 females and 18 males in 1991–2006 period. We described the pre and post release methodologies, the population and distribution dynamics, and the present status and structure of the population. Through systematic monitoring, we assessed the increase in distribution range (from 7.9 km 2 in 2000 up to 23.9 km 2 in 2022 for females with kids). Considering a time span of 25 years, the population now exceeds 1300 individuals and still shows a growing trend. Quite large mixed groups (up to > 200 individuals) are frequently seen while the largest male-only group ever seen thus far numbered 71 individuals. Overall sex ratio MM:FF reached 1.1, while the birth rate decreased from 0.70 to 0.80 in early 2010′s to 0.35–0.55 in 2021–2022, showing a potential density dependence effect and highlighting the importance of long-term monitoring to identify potential limiting factors to habitat suitability or carrying capacity of reintroduced populations.

Journal for Nature ConservationVol. 86
University of Sassari (IT), Sulzer (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.